ISSN: 0973-7510

E-ISSN: 2581-690X

Open Access
Kiran Hingonia, Ramesh Kumar Singh, Ram Narayan Meena , H.P. Verma1 and Rajendra Prasad Meena2
Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Science, Banaras Hindu University-221005, India.
Department of Agronomy1, S. K. N. Agricultural University,
Jobner-303329, Division of Agronomy2, IARI, New Delhi, India.
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2016;10(4):2925-2930 | © The Author(s). 2016
Received: 11/07/2016 | Accepted: 20/08/2016 | Published: 31/12/2016

A field study was carried out at the Banaras Hindu University’s Agricultural Research Farm during the rabi (dry) seasons of 2013-14 in a Randomized block design (RBD) with three replications, consisting of 9 treatments, namely, T (6 t/ha mulching + No irrigation), T2 (6 t/ha mulching + One irrigation at 35 DAS), T (6 t/ha mulching + Two irrigation at 35 DAS & 85 DAS), T4 (4 t/ha mulching  + No irrigation), T5 (4 t/ha mulching  + One irrigation at 35 DAS), T6 (4 t/ha mulching  + Two irrigation at 35 DAS & 85 DAS), T7 (No mulching + No irrigation), T8 (No mulching + One irrigation at 35 DAS) and T9 (No mulching + Two irrigation at 35 DAS & 85 DAS). The research results indicated that amongst different mulching and irrigation levels, the treatment T3 recorded expressively higher grain yield, straw yield, quality parameters and nutrient uptake. This in turn resulted in significant improvement in grain, straw yield, biological yield and nutrient uptake in T3 over remaining mulching and irrigation levels.


mulching; irrigation; yield; nutrient content; quality parameter.

Article Metrics

Article View: 784

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2016. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.