Research Article | Open Access
Benzhong Fu , Lei Yu, Bokai Wang and Cao Zheng
Hubei Key Laboratory of Quality Control of Characteristic Fruits and Vegetables, College of Life Science and Technology, Hubei Engineering University, Hubei Xiaogan 432000, China.
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2021;15(3):1384-1392 | Article Number: 6979
https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.15.3.30 | © The Author(s). 2021
Received: 11/04/2021 | Accepted: 24/06/2021 | Published: 24/07/2021
Abstract

Walnut blight caused by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis (Xaj) is the most important bacterial disease in walnut production worldwide. To seek biocontrol agents against Xaj, we screened 152 endophytic bacteria isolated from 87 plants. Through dual-culture method screening, we obtained four antagonistic bacteria, ATE17, BME17, CIE17, and OFE17 which were isolated from Amaranthus tricolor, Bambusa multiplex, Canna indica, and Osmanthus fragrans plants respectively. The inhibition ratios of ATE18, BME17, CIE18, and OFE17 against Xaj on plates were 1.5, 1.6, 1.3, and 1.6, respectively. These indicated they have good biocontrol potential for walnut bacterial blight. Subsequently, the four endophytic bacteria were identified by morphology, Gram staining, Microbial Identification System (fatty acid methyl ester analysis), as well as 16S rDNA and gyrB sequencing. It turns out that all four strains were identified as Bacillus sp. Furthermore, the two strains BME17 and OFE17 can suppress multiple plant fungal pathogens and bacterial pathogens on plates.

Keywords

Antagonism, Bacillus sp., Bambusa multiplex, Biocontrol agent, Endophytic bacteria, Osmanthus fragrans

Introduction

English walnut or Persian walnut (Juglans regia L) belongs to the Juglandaceae family Juglans genus. It is an important edible nut, wood oil crop, and valuable timber tree species1. Walnut kernels are composed largely of polyunsaturated fatty acid, alpha-linolenic acid, which gives them anti-atherogenic properties and brain health benefits. Walnut oil may even serve as a helpful natural remedy for hyperlipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes2. So walnuts have both nutritional and medicinal benefits3. Walnuts are widely spread both natively and commercially in Europe, Asia, and part of the United States4.

Walnut planting areas have increased sharply over the past several decades, particularly in Asia. In 2018, the global walnut harvest area was 1159484 ha with production 3 662 507 tonnes. China alone has harvested an area of 390 224 ha with production 1 586 367 tonnes5. The harvest area and production of China accounting for 33.65% and 43.31%, respectively of global totals.

With the walnut planting area increasing substantially, walnut bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis (Xaj) is also spreading around the world6,7. Currently, the disease is the most important bacterial disease affecting walnut production. The disease has sparked international concern and has been added to CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International) invasive species list8. Walnut bacterial blight negatively affects almost all walnut crown tissues. It causes early defoliation, fruit blackening and decay, immature dropping, kernel drying, oil and yield reducing, then serious walnut productivity losing and quality decreasing9.

The management of walnut bacterial blight has to date mainly relied on chemical pesticides such as copper-based compounds and streptomycin-dominated antibiotics10,11. However, these conventional control agents are now recognized to produce adverse residue and environmental problems, as well as having decreased effectiveness due to emerging pesticide resistance10,12,13.

Using biological control methods based on microbes or their derivatives has become an important direction in plant disease control. Among them, the use of plant endophytes has more advantages compared to other microorganisms in plant disease control, therefore it is one of the current hot spots in biological control research 14,15,16,17. Endophytes are facultative or obligate symbiotic microorganisms that live in apparently healthy internal plant tissues, without causing disease17. Endophytes have a capacity for disease prevention, as well as plant growth promotion, aid nitrogen fixation, and are beneficial to host plant development18,19,20.

There are many research reports on the screening, identification, and utilization of plant endophytes in plant disease control. For instance, there are fungal endophytes for suppression of Rhizoctonia solani21. Wheat endophytes inhibit the growth of Fusarium head blight. Fusarium graminearum inhibition of 30–51% and Fusarium culmorum inhibition of 15–53% have been established by dual culture assays in vitro22. Soybean endophytic bacteria Bacillus sp. and Burkholderia sp. have been proved that they can control bacterial and fungal pathogens of the host effectively in vitro, such as Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Phomopsis sojae, and Rhizoctonia solani23. Dogwood (Cornus florida) endophyte A22F1 has high potential as a biological control agent for Phytophthora capsici in pepper24. Some endophytes have been translated into commercial products14.

The identification of novel biocontrol agents is a critical step in the development of commercial biocontrol products25. Some attempts have been made in walnut bacterial blight biocontrol agent exploration. These include the examination of medicinal plant essential oils and aqueous extracts26 and bacteriophages isolated from walnut orchard soils in New Zealand and Chile27,28,29. Screening, identification, and evaluation for antagonistic bacteria led to four Pseudomonas fluorescens strains being identified as putative antagonists of Xaj and being shown to significantly reduce symptoms on walnut leaves (41% to 82%)30.

To search for more potential biocontrol agent candidates from plant endophytes resources, we investigated 50 families and 86 species of plants to isolate and screen their antagonistic effects on Xaj in vitro. Through conventional and modern techniques, we identified four antagonistic endophytes with great potential biocontrol capacity against Xaj from four different plant species.

Materials and Methods

Plants and target pathogen strains
Ninety-four samples from various parts and tissues of healthy plants were collected from Xiaogan city, Hubei province from May to September in 2017. They are distributed across 50 families, 84 genera, and 86 species (Supplement Table 1). Screening target pathogen strain Xaj BW3F331 was isolated in 2015 from Baokang county, Hubei province, and maintained on YPGA (Yeast powder 5 g, peptone 5 g, D-glucose 10 g, deionized water 1000 mL, agar 15 g, pH 7.2)32 and storage at -80 °C in 30% glycerol. More plant fungal and bacterial pathogens for antagonistic spectrum tests are listed in Table 1.

Table (1):
Two endophytes against different plant pathogens on plates.

Diseases
Pathogens
OFE17
BME17
Wheat Fusarium Head Blight
Fusarium graminearum
0.63
0.55
Orchid black spot
Alternaria alternata
0.72
0.65
Walnut anthracnose
Gloeosporium fructigenum.
0.63
0.67
Maca root rot
F. avenaceum.
0.51
0.53
Camellia black spot
A. alternate
0.61
0.48
Citrus scab
Sphaceloma fawcettii
0.30
0.33
Corn ear rot
F. graminearum
0.76
0.78
Gray leaf spot of corn
Cercospora sorghi
0.66
0.68
Corn northern leaf blight
Setosphaeria turcica
0.52
0.67
Rice blast
Magnaporthe grisea
0.73
0.74
Rice bacterial leaf streak
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae
2.45
1.21
Rice bacterial blight
X. oryzae pv. oryzicola
1.86
2.18

Note: The values for fungal pathogens mean suppression ratio; for bacterial pathogens means D/d ratio. Each value represents the mean of three replicates.

Isolation of plant endophytes
Plant samples were washed with tap water and sterilized water three times. They were then cut into around 1 cm2 patch, surface disinfected in 75% ethanol for 3 min then in 0.1% HgCl2 for 1 min. These were mashed up and suspended in ddH2O. The tissue debris suspension was spread onto a selective medium plate based on YPGA supplement with Cephalexin (30 μg/L) and Cycloheximide (100 μg/L)33, incubated at 28 °C for 2 days. Endophytes were picked for purification and cultured on a YPGA plate at 28 °C.

Screening of antagonistic bacteria
The antagonistic effect was tested via the dual culture method34. In short, fresh endophyte suspension 5 µl (OD600=0.5) inoculate to the center of the plate spread with 200 µl Xaj DW3F3 (OD600=0.5). After incubating for 2-3 d at 28 °C, the inhibitory zone and endophyte colony size are measured. Inoculation of ddH2O (2 µl) and Kanamycin (50 µg/mL) (2 µl) as the negative and positive control, respectively. The inhibitory rate (D/d) is calculated by dividing the inhibitory zone diameter (D, mm) by the endophyte colony diameter (d, mm). Each treatment was conducted in triplicate with three plates. Those endophytes with obvious inhibitory zones on plates were stocked in 30% glycerol at -80 °C.

Identification of antagonistic bacteria
Four strains with strong antagonistic effects against Xaj DW3F3 on YPGA plates were chosen to identify. They were denoted as ATE17 (Amaranthus tricolor endophyte isolated in 2017), BME17 (Bambusa multiplex endophyte isolated in 2017), CIE17 (Canna indica endophyte isolated in 2017), and OFE17 (Osmanthus fragrans endophyte isolated in 2017).

The cellular morphology of these strains was observed by Gram staining. The strains were then subjected to identification by the Microbial Identification System (MIDI Inc) based on Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) profiles. Bacterial genomic DNA was then extracted using EZ-10 Spin Column Bacterial Genomic DNA Mini-Preps Kit (Sangon Biotech Shanghai Co., Ltd.) for subsequent molecular identification. The PCR procedure and two sets of primers were used, 16S rDNA 27 F:5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and 1492R:5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′, and gyrB UP-1: 5’-GAAGTCATCATGACCGTTCTGCAYG CNGGNGGNAARTTYGA-3’ and UP-2:5’-AGCAGGGTACGGATGTGCGAGCCRTCNA CRTCNGCRTCNGTCAT-3’ sequences came from Bavykin et al35. The 16S rDNA and gyrB amplicons were sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Then the sequences were subjected to phylogenetic tree construction using the MEGAX software36.

Test of BME17 and OFE17 against multiple plant pathogens
To assay the potential ability of the endophytes against other plant pathogens, we selected two endophytes BME17 and OFE17 which showed a high inhibition ability isolated from two different plants. We tested the antagonistic effects of the two endophytes on 10 different plant fungal pathogens and two bacterial pathogens collected in our laboratory. The method used was the same as described above except the fungal confrontation culture was carried out on PDA plates. The suppression effect on fungal pathogens was calculated by (negative control radius-treat radius)/negative control radius (radius in mm).

RESULTS

Obtained four potential biocontrol agent endophytes
One hundred fifty-two endophytic bacterial strains were isolated and purified from 86 species of plants. Through dual culture screening of the target pathogen Xaj DW3F3 one by one, four strains with significant antagonistic effects on Xaj DW3F3 were obtained and verified more than five times (Fig.1). The inhibition ratio (D/d) of four endophytes ATE17, BME17, CIE17, and OFE17 were 1.5, 1.6, 1.3, and 1.6, respectively (Fig.2).

Fig. 1. Antagonistic effects of four endophytes against Xaj DW3F3 on YPGA plates.

Fig. 2. Inhibitory zone size of four endophytes against Xaj DW3F3 on YPGA plates.

Morphology and fatty acid identification
After being cultured on YPGA plates for 24 to 48h, four antagonist strain colonies were nearly round, light white, or slightly yellow. Taking a fresh colony to Gram staining and observing it under a microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE Ni-U), the cells are rod-shaped and the Gram stain is positive.

The microbial identification system based on fatty acid is fully automated for bacterial identification. It showed that the strains ATE17, BME17, CIE17, and OFE17 were most similar to Bacillus subtilis in the software’s library database (Table 2).

 

Table (2):
Endophytic bacteria identification by microbial identification system based on Fatty Acid Analysis (MIDI).

Antagonistic
bacteria
Entry
Name
Percent
Named
Sim
Index
Library
ATE17
Bacillus subtilis
91.70%
0.583
RTSBA6 6.21
BME17
Bacillus subtilis
94.14%
0.777
RTSBA6 6.21
CIE17
Bacillus subtilis
93.52%
0.77
RTSBA6 6.21
OFE17
Bacillus subtilis
93.31%
0.756
RTSBA6 6.21

16S rRNA and gyrB molecular identification
The 16S rDNA partial sequences of four antagonist strains ATE17, BME17, CIE17, and OFE17 were run through the Blastn against the NCBI Standard databases (nr, etc.) Nucleotide collection (nr/nt). These four strains are judged to be similar to dozens of different Bacillus sp., with query coverage 100%, E value 0.0, and percentage identity 100%. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on 17 Bacillus species and one out group species Virgibacillus halodenitrificans through the Neighbor-Join algorithm (bootstrap =500) (Fig. 3). Their classification position cannot be inferred yet on this basis.

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree based on Neighbor-joining tree of 22 16S-rRNA gene partial sequences.

The gyrB partial sequences of four antagonist strains ATE17, BME17, CIE17, and OFE17 were sequenced. These sequences were subjected to an NCBI Blastn search as above. They are judged to be highly similar to many different Bacillus sp. with query coverage 100%, E value 0.0, and percentage identity 100% as well. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on highly similar sequences with more than 98% identity and 98% query coverage (bootstrap =1000) (Fig. 4). Based on the tree, we cannot infer species positions for these strains.

Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree based on Maximum Likelihood tree of 22 gyrB gene partial sequences.

Hereby, we tentatively identified the four antagonist bacteria as Bacillus sp. based on combined morphology, microbe identification system, and housekeeping genes.

Inhibition of different pathogens by BME17 and OFE17
We selected the two endophytes BME17 and OFE17 for assessing their antagonistic properties against various plant pathogens. The two endophytes presented antagonistic effects on all 10 crop fungal pathogens and two rice bacterial pathogens (Table 1). The result suggests the strains have broad-spectrum antagonistic roles instead of specific functions and have potential biocontrol roles against both fungal and bacterial diseases.

DISCUSSION

Developing novel, economical, and environment-friendly walnut bacterial blight biocontrol agents is challenging. Amongst, exploiting plant endophytes is an important methodology in this direction.

Screening biocontrol agents from many plant resources is the first step in this important work. However, to date, only a few plant endophytes have been screened for the treatment of disease. Ozaktan et al30 assayed 29 epiphytes from healthy walnut leaves against Xaj, 18 strains have antagonistic effects with inhibitory zone 3.0 to 13.0mm. Bacteria measured as around 60% antagonistic, have decreased walnut bacterial blight 41-77% on walnut seedlings.

In this study, we screened 152 endophytes from 86 plant species, and obtained four strains with strong antagonistic effects on the target pathogen Xaj. Through multiple identification methods, we determined that they are all Bacillus sp. (this identification is tentative, due to Bacillus genera classification complexity). These antagonistic bacteria do not belong to the same genera as those identified as P. fluorescens against Xaj30. The in vitro inhibition provides the first evidence that these endophytes are potential biocontrol agents of walnut bacterial blight. Our research has added to the potential arsenal of a biological agent in combating walnut bacterial blight.

Although we screened 152 endophytes, only four potential biocontrol agent strains were discovered (their effects verified through experimental replication). The positive selection frequency is 2.6%. This low frequency is similar to that found in research in coffee berry disease antagonistic bacteria screening, in which from a total of 4 323 microorganisms isolates around 3% exhibited detectable inhibition37.

We obtained antagonistic bacteria isolated from four plants common in our location, A. tricolor, B. multiplex, C. indica, and O. fragrans. In each of these plants, only some endophytes were studied for their biocontrol ability. For example, there were 46 endophytic bacteria and 17 fungi isolated from amaranth plant, among them six bacterial endophyte isolates and one fungal endophyte were found to be efficient in inhibiting the growth of its leaf blight pathogen Rhizoctonia solani in vitro38. Endophytic fungi isolates from bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) branches were found to have high bioactivity against Botryotinia fuckeliana and Thanatephorus cucumeris39. Endophytic bacteria were isolated from C. indica proved to be P.fluorescens, Enterobacter sp., Erwinia sp. and all of them have plant growth promoting ability40. There were two endophytes isolated from O. fragrance that were identified as Bacillus sp. too. One endophyte Bacillus sp. isolated from O. fragrance can be used in honey wine41. Another endophyte strain B. safensis B21, isolated from O. fragrans fruits, showed antifungal activity against Magnaporthe oryzae42. These are thus broad antimicrobe spectrum bacteria we tested in this study. These Bacillus spp. are not only antagonistic against bacteria but also fungi.

In our search process, we only isolated 152 endophytic bacteria from 86 plant species. On one hand, we added antibiotics into the isolation medium and on the other hand, the bacterial colony was hard to distinguish. We simply picked up those distinct single colonies obvious to the naked eye. Possibly we ignored some isolates on the plates with similar colony morphology.

Bacillus bacteria is one of the most important biocontrol resources. Many active substances have been discovered, and even already used in the field. In our projects, the evaluation of biocontrol effectiveness on plants, and active substances are under investigation. Although we obtained four potential antagonistic bacteria, there is much additional work to be done on the way to developing powerful biocontrol agents for disease control. The present results will lay a foundation for further exploring the function and application of such agents in the future.

Supplementary information

Additional file: Additional Table S1.

Declarations

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank Dr. Stephen B. Vardeman from Iowa State University for his meticulous language editing of this manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
BF designed the experiments. LY and BW performed the experiments. BF, L Y and BW analyzed the data. BF wrote the manuscript. CZ reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

FUNDING
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700069).

ETHICS STATEMENT
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA
The sequences obtained during this study are included in the manuscript with a public database deposit number.

References
  1. Pollegioni P, Woeste K, Chiocchini F, et al. Rethinking the history of common walnut (Juglans regia L.) in Europe: Its origins and human interactions. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0172541.
    Crossref
  2. Zibaeenezhad MJ, Farhadi P, Attar A, et al. Effects of walnut oil on lipid profiles in hyperlipidemic type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutr Diabetes. 2017;7:e259.
    Crossref
  3. Ros E, Izquierdo-Pulido M, Sala-Vila A. Beneficial effects of walnut consumption on human health: Role of micronutrients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018;21(6):498-504.
    Crossref
  4. Bernard A, Lheureux F, Dirlewanger E. Walnut: past and future of genetic improvement. Tree Genet Genomes. 2018;14:1.
    Crossref
  5. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize.
  6. Frutos D. Bacterial diseases of walnut and hazelnut and genetic resources. Journal of Plant Pathology. 2010;92:S1.79-s1.85.
  7. Lamichhane JR. Xanthomonas arboricola Diseases of Stone Fruit, Almond, and Walnut Trees: Progress Toward Understanding and Management. Plant Disease. 2014;98(12):1600-1610.
    Crossref
  8. https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/56946.
  9. Moragrega C, Matias J, Aletà N, Montesinos E, Rovira M. Apical Necrosis and Premature Drop of Persian (English) Walnut Fruit Caused by Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis. Plant Disease. 2011;95(12):1565-1570.
    Crossref
  10. Ninot A, Aletà N, Moragrega C, Montesions E. Evaluaton of a reduced copper spraying program to control bacterial blight of walnut. Plant Disease. 2002;86(6):583-587.
    Crossref
  11. Polito VS, Pinney K, Buchner R, Olson W. Streptomycin applications to control walnut blight disease can prevent fertilization and increase fruit drop. HortScience. 2002;37(6):940-942.
    Crossref
  12. Gardan L, Brault T, Germain E. Copper resistance of Xanthomonas capestris pv. juglandis in French walnut orchards and its association with conjugative plasmids. Acta Hortic. 1993;311:259-265.
    Crossref
  13. Vagelas LK, Rumbos CI, Tsiantos J. Variation in disease development among persian walnut cultivars, selections and crosses when inoculated with Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis in Greece. Journal of Plant Pathology. 2012;94:S1.57-S1.61.
  14. Mota MS, Gomes CB, Souza Junior IT, Moura AB. Bacterial selecton for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48(1):62-70.
    Crossref
  15. Parikh L, Eskelson MJ, Adesemoye AO. Relationship of in vitro and in planta screening: improving the selection process for biological control agents against Fusarium root rot in row crops. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection. 2018;51(3-4):156-169.
    Crossref
  16. De Silva NI, Brooks S, Lumyong S, Hyde KD. Use of endophytes as biocontrol agents. Fungal Biol Rev. 2019;33(2):133-148.
    Crossref
  17. Rabiey M, Hailey LE, Roy SR, et al. Endophytes vs tree pathogens and pests: can they be used as biological control agents to improve tree health? Eur J Plant Pathol. 2019;155:711-729.
    Crossref
  18. Alström S, Van Vuurde JWL. Endophytic Bacteria and Biocontrol of Plant Diseases. Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 2001:60-67.
    Crossref
  19. da Silva Ribeiro A, Polonio JC, Costa AT, et al. Bioprospection of Culturable Endophytic Fungi Associated with the Ornamental Plant Pachystachys lutea. Curr Microbiol. 2018;75(5):588-596.
    Crossref
  20. Pandey SS, Singh S, Pandey H, et al. Endophytes of Withania somnifera modulate in planta content and the site of withanolide biosynthesis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5450.
    Crossref
  21. Lahlali R, Hijri M. Screening, identification and evaluation of potential biocontrol fungal endophytes against Rhizoctonia solani AG3 on potato plants. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;311(2):152-159.
    Crossref
  22. Comby M, Gacoin M, Robineau M, et al. Screening of wheat endophytes as biological control agents against Fusarium head blight using two different in vitro tests. Microbiol Res. 2017;202:11-20.
    Crossref
  23. de Almeida Lopes KB, Carpentieri-Pipolo V, Fira D, et al. Screening of bacterial endophytes as potential biocontrol agents against soybean diseases. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125(5):1466-1481.
    Crossref
  24. Mmbaga MT, Gurung S, Maheshwari A. Screening of Plant Endophytes as Biological Control Agents against Root Rot Pathogens of Pepper (Capsicum annum L.).
    J Plant Pathol Microbiol. 2018;9(3):435.
    Crossref
  25. Raymaekers K, Ponet L, Holtappels D, Berckmans B, Cammue BPA. Screening for novel biocontrol agents applicable in plant disease management – A review. Biological Control. 2020;144:104240.
    Crossref
  26. Soltani J, Aliabadi AA. Antibacterial Effects of Several Plant Extracts and Essential Oils on Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis in vitro. Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants. 2013;16(4):461-468.
    Crossref
  27. McNeil DL, Romero S, Kandula J, Stark C, Stewart A, Larsen S. Bacteriophages a potential biocontrol agent against walnut blight (Xanthomonas campestris pv juglandis). New Zealand Plant Protecton. 2001;54:220-224.
    Crossref
  28. Romero-Suarez S, Jordan B, Heinemann JA. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, the causal agent of walnut blight disease. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28(5):1917-1927.
    Crossref
  29. Retamales J, Vasquez I, Santos L, et al. Complete Genome Sequences of Lytic Bacteriophages of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis. Genome Announc. 2016;4(3):e00336-16.
    Crossref
  30. Ozaktan H, Erdal M, Akkopru A, Aslan E. Biological control of bacterial blight of walnut by antagonistic bacteria. Journal of Plant Pathology. 2012;94(1):S1.53-S1.56.
  31. Fu B, Chen Q, Wei M, et al. Complete genome sequence of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis strain DW3F3, isolated from a Juglans regia L. bacterial blighted fruitlet. Genome Announc. 2018;6(8):e00023-18.
    Crossref
  32. Hajri A, Meyer D, Delort F, Guillaumès J, Brin C, Manceau C. Identificaton of a genetic lineage within Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis as the causal agent of vertical oozing canker of Persian (English) walnut in France. Plant Pathol. 2010;59(6):1014-1022.
    Crossref
  33. Palacio-Bielsa A, Pothier JF, Perez MR, Duffy B, Lopez MM. Detection and identification methods and new tests as developed and used in the framework of cost873 for bacteria pathogenic to stone fruits and nuts: Tumorigenic agrobacterium spp. Journal of Plant Pathology. 2012;94(1):97-104.
  34. Lin Y, Du D, Si C, Zhao Q, Li Z, Li P. Potential biocontrol Bacillus sp. strains isolated by an improved method from vinegar waste compost exhibit antibiosis against fungal pathogens and promote growth of cucumbers. Biological Control. 2014;71:7-15.
    Crossref
  35. Bavykin SG, Lysov YP, Zakhariev V et al. Use of 16S rRNA, 23S rRNA, and gyrB gene sequence analysis to determine phylogenetic relationships of Bacillus cereus group microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(8):3711-3730.
    Crossref
  36. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547-1549.
    Crossref
  37. Asfaw K, Husein T, Ayalew A, Dejene M, Sahile S. In vitro Screening and Characterizing the Most Promising Antagonistic Microorganism as Biocontrol Agent(s) Against Colletotrichum kahawae. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 2018;8(1):1.
    Crossref
  38. Uppala SS, Beena S, Chapala MM, Bowen KL. Amaranth endophytes and their role in plant growth promotion. In: Reddy MS, Desai S, Sayyed RZ, et al (Ed.). Plant Growth Promotion by Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Agriculture. India: Scientific Publishers. 2010:531-537.
  39. Shen X, Zheng D, Gao J, Hou C. Isolation and evaluation of endophytic fungi with antimicrobial ability from Phyllostachys edulis. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology. 2012;7(4):249-257.
    Crossref
  40. Wang X, Zhang M, Yan P, et al. Growth promoting ability and enhanced effects on water purification of endophytic bacteria from Canna indica. Journal of Lake Sciences. 2019;31:1582-1591.
  41. Fan J, He R, Wu H, et al. Study on the Screening of Osmanthus fragranse Endophytes and the Technology Condition for Making Honey Wine. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences. 2015,10:149-151.
  42. Rong S, Xu H, Li L, Chen R, Gao X, Xu Z. Antifungal activity of endophytic Bacillus safensis B21 and its potential application as a biopesticide to control rice blast. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2020;162:69-77.
    Crossref

Article Metrics

Article View: 399

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.