ISSN: 0973-7510
E-ISSN: 2581-690X
Groundnut is known to be “king of oilseed crop” also referred as peanut or monkey-nut (Arachis hypogea) belongs to the family leguminoceae. A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2010 at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. 268 Recombinant inbreed lines (RILs) were developed from the cross TAG 24 x GPBD 4. Path analysis was helped to study the extent and nature of direct and indirect effects of yield contributing characters and developmental traits on pod yield. The characters which had positive direct effect with high magnitude were oil content and test weight. The characters which had positive direct effect with lower magnitude were seed phosphorous content and shelling percentage at phenotypic level. Path coefficient analysis indicated that test weight had direct effect and indirect effect on pod yield.
Groundnut, seed phosphorous content, yield.
Groundnut also referred as peanut or monkey-nut (Arachis hypogea) is the most important oilseed crop of tropical subtropical and temperate regions of the world. India ranks second in the world in groundnut production. It is a valuable cash crop cultivated by millions of small farmers, because of its economic and nutritional value. It is an annual legume crop, grown mainly for quality edible oil (40- 50%) and easily digestible protein (25%) in the seeds. Pod growth and development occupy an important position in determining the final quality and economic yield in groundnut crop. It is known as “king of oilseed crop” is believed to be native of Brazil (South America) and belongs to the family leguminoceae and sub-family papilionaceae and it is self-pollinated.
The role of seed phosphorus is that a plant seed contains a store of the nutrients necessary to keep its embryo alive and to provide the embryo with essential nutrient elements when it germinates and starts to grow. Seed phosphorus directly effects plant shoot and root growth only during the early stages of growth of the embryo and the seedling (Mike Bolland et al., 2006).
Variability studies are the basic studies to assess the genotypes for their variation in quantitative and qualitative characters. The extent of the genetic and non-genetic components of variation formulates proper breeding programme to reach the goal. More variability in characters indicates the scope for selection of genotypes for further genetic studies (Khote et al., 2009). Recently, it has been indicated that there is a variation in seed P content in groundnut genotypes (Gupta et al., 2010).
Pod yield is the ultimate economic product in groundnut, which is determined mainly by pod weight and the number of pods per unit area. Most of the yield component shows a direct influence on pod yield (Natarajarathnam, 1979).
A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2010 at Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad to assess the Genotypic and phenotypic path analysis for yield and yield components in Groundnut.
Recombinant inbreed lines (RILs) were developed from the cross TAG 24 x GPBD 4. These comprises of 268 RILs which segregated for agronomic trait, foliar disease reaction, nutritional and oil quality traits (Gowda et al. 2002). A set of 268 RILs were evaluated for quantitative traits in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with two replications with 30X10cm spacing under field condition. Three plants from each line were taken for recording the physiological, biochemical and yield parameters. Phosphorus content in plant sample was determined by digestion of the plant sample and with the vanadomolybdate yellow colour (Jackson, 1973) method.
Path analysis was helped to study the extent and nature of direct and indirect effects of yield contributing characters and developmental traits on pod yield.
Directs effects of various characters on pod yield
Four characters out of six had positive and directs effects on pod yield at phenotypic level. The characters which had positive direct effect with high magnitude were oil content and test weight. The characters which had positive direct effect with lower magnitude were seed phosphorous content and shelling percentage at phenotypic level. The characters which had negative direct effects with pod yield were SPAD at 60 days after sowing and with SPAD at 90 days after sowing.
Whereas at genotypic level, out of six parameters only four characters had positive directs effects on pod yield. The characters which had positive direct effect with high magnitude were oil content and test weight. The characters which had positive direct effect with lower magnitude were seed phosphorous content and shelling percentage at phenotypic level.
Indirect effects of various characters on pod yield
SPAD at 60 days after sowing had negative indirect influence on grain yield at phenotypic level and genotypic level through SPAD at 90 days after sowing, seed phosphorous content, shelling percentage and 100 seed weight. It had positive influence on pod yield through the characters oil content.
SPAD at 90 days after sowing had positive and indirect influence on pod yield through seed phosphorous content and test weight. Its influence on pod yield was observed to be in negative direction through SPAD at 60 days after sowing, oil content, and shelling percentage both the level.
This character had positive indirect influence on pod yield through test weight, SPAD at 60 days after sowing and shelling percentage. While the character SPAD at 90 days after sowing and oil content had negative indirect influence but on pod yield at phenotypic and genotypic level.
Oil content had negative indirect influence on grain yield at phenotypic and genotypic level through SPAD at 60 days after sowing, seed phosphorous content and test weight. It had positive and indirect influence on pod yield through SPAD at 90 days after sowing, shelling percentage.
Shelling percentage had positive indirect influence on pod yield through SPAD at 60 days after sowing, SPAD at 90 days after sowing , seed phosphorous content, oil content and 100 seed weight both at phenotypic and genotypic level.
Test weight had positive indirect influence on pod yield through seed phosphorous content and shelling percentage. It influences pod yield negatively through SPAD at 90 days after sowing and oil content both at phenotypic and genotypic level.
Path coefficient analysis is a statistical device developed by Wright (1921). The analysis takes into an account the cause and effect relation between the variable and is unique in partitionong the association into direct and indirect effect through other independent variables. Path coefficient analysis also measures the relative importance of casual factors involved. In the present study, Path coefficient analysis was done at phenotypiic and genotypic level and results are discussed below.
Four characters out of six had positive and directs effects on pod yield at phenotypic level. The characters which had positive direct effect with high magnitude were oil content and test weight. The characters which had positive direct effect with lower magnitude were seed phosphorous content and shelling percentage at phenotypic level. At genotypic level, out of six parameters only four characters had positive directs effects on pod yield. The characters which had positive direct effect with high magnitude were oil content and test weight. The characters which had positive direct effect with lower magnitude were seed phosphorous content and shelling percentage at phenotypic level. Path coefficient analysis indicated that test weight had direct effect and indirect effect on pod yield. These results are in accordance with Ayub Khan et al. (2000), Deshmukh et al.(1986) and Bhagat et al (1986).indirect effect via seed phosphorous content and shelling percentage.
Table (1):
Genotypic and phenotypic path analysis for yield and yield components in 268 RILs in groundnut.
| Parameters | SPAD 60 DAS | SPAD 90 DAS | Seed P content (%) | Oil content (%) | Shelling percentage (%) | Test weight (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPAD 60 DAS | P | -0.2165 | -0.0261 | -0.0044 | 0.0073 | -0.0281 | -0.002 |
| G | -0.5156 | -0.0922 | -0.0233 | 0.0124 | -0.0816 | -0.0015 | |
| SPAD 90 DAS | P | -0.0121 | -0.1006 | 0.0028 | -0.0083 | -0.0014 | 0.0019 |
| G | -0.0153 | -0.0854 | 0.0027 | -0.0094 | -0.0027 | 0.0059 | |
| Seed P content (%) | P | 0.0002 | -0.0001 | 0.0022 | -0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 |
| G | 0.0004 | -0.0003 | 0.0088 | -0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0009 | |
| Oil content (%) | P | -0.0071 | 0.0174 | -0.0026 | 0.2115** | 0.0079 | -0.0047 |
| G | -0.0076 | 0.0349 | -0.0061 | 0.3167** | 0.0248 | -0.045 | |
| Shelling percentage (%) | P | 0.0045 | 0.0005 | 0.0003 | 0.0013 | 0.0348 | 0.0119 |
| G | 0.0079 | 0.0016 | 0.0005 | 0.0039 | 0.0501 | 0.0297 | |
| Test weight (g) | P | 0.0014 | -0.003 | 0.0106 | -0.0034 | 0.0529 | 0.1548* |
| G | 0.0009 | -0.0215 | 0.0305 | -0.0439 | 0.1829** | 0.3085** | |
| Pod yield (g/plant) | P | -0.2297** | -0.1118 | 0.0089 | 0.2083** | 0.066 | 0.1621** |
| G | -0.5293** | -0.1629** | 0.013 | 0.2796** | 0.1736** | 0.2985** | |
G= Genotypic, P= Phenotypic
Shelling percentage had direct positive and indirect positive effect on pod yield via many characters like seed phosphorous content, shelling percentage and test weight. The results are in agreement with the findings Ayub Khan et al. (2000) and Abraham (1990).
- Abraham, M. J., Correlation, path and discriminate function analysis in groundnut grown in ‘P’ deficient acid soil. Crop Improve., 1990; 17: 34-37.
- Ayub Khan, Rahim, M., Khan,M.I., Tahir, M., Genetic variability and criterian for the selection of high yielding peanut genotypes. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 2000,
- Bhagat , N.R., Ahmad, T., Lalwant, H.B. and Nagaraj, G., variation ,character association and path analysis in improved groundnut varieties. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 1986; 56: 300-302.
- Deashmukh, S. N., Basu, M. S. and Reddy, P. S., Genetic variability, character association and path co-efficient of quantitative traits in varginia bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian J.Agic. 1986; 56:816-821.
- Gowda, M.V.C., Motagi, B.N., Naidu,G.K., Diddimani,S.N. and Sheshagiri, R., GPBD 4: A Spanish bunch groundnut genotype resistance to rust and late leaf spot. Int. Arachis Newslett., 2002; 22:29-32.
- Gupta, P.C., Koti, R.V., Chetti, M.B., Janagoudar, B. S., Hebsur, N. S., Effect of inositol on seed development and yield potential in groundnut. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 2010; 23(3) : 506-508.
- Jackson, M.L., Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited New Delhi, 1973; pp.38-82.
- Khote, A. C., Bendale, V. W., Bhave, S. G. and Patil, P. P., Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in some exotic genotypes of groundnut.(Arachis hypogaea L.) Crop Res., 2009; 37(1, 2&3):186-191.
- Mike Bolland, Bunbury and Blakely Paynter, Seed phosphorus. Northam Agriculture Western Australia., 2006; 59-91.
- Natarajarathnam N., Venkateshwara Rao, T. and Padhumanabham, G., Physiological basis of growth and yield attribute in cowpea genotypes. Madras agric. J., 1979; 74:765-770.
- Wright, S., Correlation and causation. J. Agril. Res., 1921; 20:202-209.
© The Author(s) 2017. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.