Open Access

Davoud Nassiri, Vadood Razavilar* and Abasali Motalebi

Department of Food Hygiene, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2016;10(4):2641-2646
https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.10.4.21 | © The Author(s). 2016
Received: 03/08/2016 | Accepted: 20/10/2016 | Published: 31/12/2016
Abstract

Campylobacter species are the most important pathogens that cause bacterial gastroenteritis being spread through food with animal origin. Given such fact, the current study aimed at evaluating Campylobacter phenotypic and genotypic outbreaks in chicken meat and its edible offal at West Azerbaijan province, Iran. To conduct the study, a total of 552 chicken samples including meat (138 samples), liver (138 samples), gizzard (138 samples) and hearts (138 samples) were randomly collected from poultry slaughterhouses at West Azerbaijan province from April 2014 to September 2014. Based on the culture tests, 208 samples (37/7%) were infected with Campylobacter species. The highest range of Campylobacter species outbreaks was observed in poultry liver (49/2%), followed by gizzard (42/8%), heart (33/3 %) and meat(25/4%). Among the isolated Campylobacter, the Jejuni type was the most prevalent (78/4%) and the rest were of Coli type (21/6%). All 208 species of Campylobacter isolated as Jejuni and Coli types from culturing were also approved bymultiplex polymerase chain reaction test (m.PCR).A statistically significant difference (P <0.05) was observed in Campylobacter species outbreak in meat samples taken in summer (40/9%). The results of the study pinpointed to the chicken edible offal importance as a potential source of bacterial Campylobacter infections.

Keywords

Campylobacter, Poultry Meat, edible Offal’s, Western Azerbaijan.

Introduction

Campylobacteriosis, serving as an important common disease, shoulders a major role in infectious gastroenteritis in humans and is considered as the world’s first cause of gastroenteritis followed by dysentery and diarrhea and other complications such as meningitis, Guillain Barre Syndrome and Cholecystitis18, 1

Digestive disorders and diarrhea caused by the bacterial Campylobacter is among the common illnesses primarily in developing countries, and 5 to 15 percent of diarrhea in these countries are instigated by the bacteria, and the prevalence of the bacteria as a cause of diarrhea in our country has been reported to be from 2 to 10 % (11), and even the primary cause of death in developed countries, especially among children under 5 in the United States, was attributed to such bacteriain that two million cases of bacterial infection are reported each year./18

The bacteria which was first discovered in the nineteenth century by Theodor Escherichia a gram-negative, spiral-shaped or curved, growing and multiplying  at Microaerophilic conditions at a temperature of 42°C, and below 25°C, it stops growing and multiplying but does not disappear18. The thermophilic Campylobacter species, such as Jejuni and Coli, have an important role in the development of Campylobacteriosis becoming more prominent in the food infection as the spread of Campylobacter contamination in food has become very important in recent years going even further than Salmonella.18 Studies show that the bacterium originates mainly from food with animal resource. Moreover, raw milk, meat and poultry, untreated surface water and edible fungi are the sources of infections with Campylobacteriosis disease being common in spring and summer. Infections with Campylobacter have been reported in several countries in broiler chickens, so that the bacteria survived during the slaughtering process and were transmitted to uninfected poultry organs18

Due to its high sensitivity and detection speed, the PCR method has the potentiality to determine if there is even a bacterium per ml and reaches the response in a very short time. Many studies have examined the prevalence of the bacteria in meat and poultry as well as diarrheal samples.15 The consumption of half-baked meat and the related products serves as the main source of human infection although other livestock meat and milk products are potential sources of the disease. There are reports on the prevalence of Campylobacter among live birds and animals and different kinds of food from all over the world revealing upon a wide range of results.

Previous reports highlighted the infection in chickens from zero to 100% which was up to 60% for the cows. The prevalence of the infection in poultry given to the market have been reported to be100%and lower incidences of other animals meat were also given.7,22 Although there are many studies casting light on the prevalence of Campylobacter species among poultry in Iran16,17,21,23 and other countries including Korea,10 Japan,22 Canada,24 Ireland,25 Pakistan12 Belgium,9 little data existed on the poultry meat bi-products infection including liver, gizzard and heart in Iran, therefore, the study aimed at evaluating the contamination of these products.

Materials and Methods

To conduct the study, a total of 552 samples including chicken meat (138 samples), liver (138 samples), gizzard (138 samples) and hearts (138 samples) were randomly collected from poultry slaughterhouses at West Azerbaijan province from April 2014 to September 2014and were transferred to the laboratory for analysis aiming at investigating the presence of Campylobacter species in cold temperature.

To determine the phenotype of bacteria, 10 grams of the sample was added to abag with one hundred ml broth Preston (Preston enrichment broth base, himedia, Mumbai, India, m899) containing five percent defibrinated sheep blood for enrichment. The bags were incubated for 24 hours at 42°C in carbon dioxide presence. Then, the liquid in the bag was removed by a sterile loop and cultured on specific Campylobacter selective Agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India, m994) as a separate line to obtain single separated colonies. Then, it was incubated for 48 hours (Co2 10% v / v) at 42°C. After the initial plate analysis, the suspected colonies were stained with Gram’s stain and upon the curved bacteria resolution, the re-culturing was also applied. Upon obtaining the colonies, the biochemical tests including catalase, Indoxyl acetate hydrolysis were used and in order to differentiate between the two species Jejuni and Coli hippurate hydrolysis test was conducted, which was positive for Jejuni1.

To investigate the Campylobactergenotypic, DNA extractionand Multiplex PCR method wereapplied. Using theculturing method and DNA extraction kit (Cina Gen, Iran), the confirmed colonies DNA were extracted according to the Kit manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR test in this study followed Denis et al. (1999) procedure3 For PCR reaction, the reaction final volume of 25 microlitres was considered  including 20 ng DNA template, 2 mM MgCl2, 25 pmol of each primer, a single Taq polymerase enzyme and 200 mM mixed dNTP. The size of PCR products corresponding to each sample is given below. To confirm the presence of the multiplied sample, 20 microlitres of PCR was paced on electrophoresis with1/5 percent agarose gel containing ethidium bromide in the presence of 100 bp DNA marker in constant voltage of 80 volts.

RESULTS

The current study aimed at evaluating Campylobacter phenotypic and genotypic outbreaks in chicken meat and its edible offal at West Azerbaijan province, Iran. To conduct the study, a total of 552 samples including chicken meat (138 samples), liver (138 samples), gizzard (138 samples) and hearts (138 samples) were randomly collected from poultry slaughter houses at West Azerbaijan province from April 2014 to September 2014 and were transferred to the laboratory for analysis aiming at investigating the presence of Campylobacter species in cold temperature.

Based on the culture tests, 208 samples (37/7 %) were infected with Campylobacter species. The highest range of Campylobacter species outbreaks was observed in poultry liver (49/2 %), followed by gizzard (42/8%), heart (33/3%) and chicken meat (25/4%). Among the isolated Campylobacter, the Jejuni type was the most prevalent (78/4%) and the rest were of Coli type (21/6%). All 208 species of Campylobacter isolated as Jejuni and Coli types from culturing were also approved by multiplex polymerase chain reaction test (m. PCR). A statistically significant difference (P <0.05) was observed in Campylobacter species outbreak in meat samples taken in summer (40/9%). The results are presented in the following tables:
Table (1):
Sequences of primers used for detecting Campylobacter and the related Jejuni and Coli species.

Type of product
Primer consequence
Gene
857bp for Campylobacter
genus
MD16S1 Upper Primer
3 ATC TAA TGG CTT AAC CAT TAA AC5
MD16S1 Lower Primer
3GGA CGG TAA CTA GTT TAG TAT T 5
16S rRNA
589bp for C. jejuni
MDmapA1 upper Primer
3CTA TTT TAT TTT TGA GTG CTT GTG 5
MDmapA2 Lower Primer
3GCT TTA TTT GCC ATT TGT TTT ATT A5
mapA
462bp for C. coli
COL3 Upper Primer
3AAT TGA AAA TTG CTC CAA CTA TG5
MDCOL2 Lower Primer
3TGA TTT TAT TAT TTG TAG CAG CG5
CeuE

Table (2):
The contamination of chicken meat and its related edible offal to Campylobacter and its species.

Samples
Number
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter infection
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter jejuni infection
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter coli infection
Meat
138
35 (4/25%)
32 (4/91%)
3 (6/8%)
Liver
138
68 (2/49%)
61 (7/89%)
7 (3/10%)
gizzard
138
59 (8/42 %)
53 (8/89 %)
6 (2/10 %)
hearts
138
46 (3/33 %)
42 (3/91 %)
4 (7/8 %)

Table (3):
Monthly contamination of chicken meat and its related edible offal to Campylobacter and its species.

Months
Number
Positive Number and percentage of campylobacter infection
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter jejuni infection
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter coli infection
March
92
29 (6/31%)
23 (3/79%)
6 (7/20%)
April
92
32 (8/34%)
25 (1/78%)
7 (9/21%)
May
92
34 (37%)
26 ( 5/76 % )
8 (5/23%)
June
92
35 (38%)
28 ( 80 %)
7 ( 20%)
July
92
37 (2/40%)
29 ( 4/78 %)
8 (6/21%)
August
92
41 (6/44%)
32 (78%)
9 (22%)

Table (4):
The seasonal contamination of chicken meat and its related edible offal to Campylobacter and its species.

Season
Number of samples
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter infection
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter jejuni infection
Positive Number and percentage of Campylobacter coli infection
Spring
276
95 (4/34%)
74 (9/77%)
21 (1/22%)
summer
276
113 (9/40%)
89 (8/78%)
24 (2/21%)
Total
552
208 (7/37 %)
163(4/78 %)
45 (6/21 %)
DISCUSSION

The given result shows 208 samples (37/7%) were infected with Campylobacter species. Previous studies in Iran have reported the contamination level to the bacteria for different cities as Isfahan with 56/1 percent,17 Shahrekord with 47 percent,16 Tehran with 63/2% and 49/5%21 and Mashhad with 76%.8

The outbreak of Campylobacter species in chicken meat in other countries also suggests a contamination level of30 to 90 percent. The contamination levels in different countries were as follows: Turkey with 92/8%,26 Korea with 68/3%,10 Canada with 62/4%,24 Japan with 60%,22 Ireland with 49/90%25 and Pakistan  with 48%.12 Despite having many studies reporting the prevalence of Campylobacter species contamination in poultry, there are few studies highlighting on the edible offal contamination to the bacteria.

A similar study conducted byRahimiin2006 and 2008 casted light on the prevalence of Campylobacter in the chicken liver marketed in Isfahan. Accordingly, the contamination of 205 samples under study was reported to be 49/3%, and the liver contamination for the, chicken, turkey and ostrich were4 9/3%, 40% and 16/7%, respectively.17 Also, Shakerian et al (2004) in a study on evaluating the Campylobacter contamination in poultry liver in Shahrekord indicated that 259 samples of 400 samples (64/8%) were infected with Jejuni Campylobacter.20

The report by Gafir et al (2007) suggests that contamination of broiler chicken liver distributed in Belgium capital from 1997 to1998 was about 68/7%. The chicken liver infection rate in 1997 and 1998 were 61/7% (74 from 120) and 74/6% (106 from 143).9 Sallam et al (2007) reported the contamination of meat and edible offal for chicken from 40 to 77 for breast, thighs, wings, liver, gizzard and heart as 64/4%, 70%, 77/1%, 64%, 45% and 40%, respectively.19

Suzuki and Yammamato (2009) reported the contamination of chicken meat, gizzard, liver and heart as 59%, 62/2%, 62/3% and 33/3, respectively.22 In both studies similar to result of this study, the highest infection rates was in liver and the lowest was observed in heart. The reason could be due to liver greater contact area than the heart and its further manipulation. The differences between the results reported from different parts could be attributed to the poultry infection rates in different regions, the interval between studies, the difference in the killing and hygiene practices during different slaughtering phases, sampling seasons and sensitivity of testing methods.

The results showed that among the isolated Campylobacter, the Jejuni type was the most prevalent (78/4 %) and the rest were of Coli type (21/6 %). Other studies have also shown that Jejuni type is the most common species in food with animal origin.6,8,12,16,17,22 For example, in a study by Hussain et al (2007) the prevalence of Campylobacter species (Jejuni and Coli)in food samples with animal origin was70/6% and 29/4%, respectively. The same study reported the prevalence of Jejuni and Coli Campylobacter in chicken as, 72% and 28%, in sheep meat as 65% and 35% and in cow meat as 79% and 21%, respectively.12

Another similar study in 2004 was conducted in Ireland by Whyte et al. focusing on Jejuni and Coli Campylobacter in food with animal origin which revealed the fact that the contamination level for Jejuni and Coli type were 3804 and 16/6, respectively. The prevalence of bacteria in chicken as 6/84 and 6/16% have been reported.25

Moreover, evaluating the Campylobacter contamination in poultry meat samples in different season showed there existed a significant difference in contamination level in summer (50 /.> P) than in other seasons which was also confirmed by reports from other studies.24  Such high prevalence could be attributed to high temperature creating favorable conditions for the bacteria growth of and transferring of infection by insects.

The overall results of this study on chicken meat and its edible offal contamination to Campylobacter species showed that a relatively high number of samples especially the liver were infected with this pathogen. Therefore, in order to reduce contamination of chicken meat and its edible products to Campylobacter species and similar microorganisms, maintaining individual health, preserving sanitation in slaughterhouses, following HACCP principles in poultry chains, minimizing the carcasses contact with the edible offal, minimizing the chicken carcasses contact and maintaining the least manipulation and drinking water in slaughtering process seem to be the most important. Also, maintaining hygiene practices in splitting, packaging, and transportation stages and maintaining the cold condition in meat preserving chain until being delivered to consumer serve as very important measures in reducing meat contamination to such pathogens.

References
  1. Bolton F.J., Wareing D.R., Skirrow M.B. and Hutchinson D.N. Identification and biotyping of Campylobacter. In: Board G.R., Jones D. and Skinner F.A. (1992): Identification Methods in Applied and Environmental Microbiology. Society for Applied Microbiology, Technical Series 29Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp:151-161
  2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Preliminary Food Net data on the incidence of food borne illnesses selected sites, United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 51: 325–329.
  3. Denis M., Soumet C., Rivoal K., Ermel G., Blivet D., Salvat G., et al. Development of a m-PCR for simultaneous identification of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. Letter of Applied Microbiology, 1999; 29: 406-410
  4. Dingle, K.E., Van Den Braak, N., Colles, F.M., Price, L.J., Woodward, D.L., Rodgers, F.G., Endtz, H.P, Van Belkum, A. and Maiden, M.C.J. Sequence typing confirms that Campylobacter jejuni strains associated with Guillain-Barre and Miller-Fisher syndromes are diverse genetic lineage, serotype and flagella type, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2001; 39: 3346-3349.
  5. Efrye R, Guandalini S, TM Akram. Diarrhea, Emedicine Journal. February. 2002, 3(2); 1-23
  6. Franchin P.R., Ogliari P.J. and Batista C.R.V. Frequency of thermophilic Campylobacter in broiler chickens during industrial processing in a Southern Brazil slaughterhouse. British Poultry Science, 2007; 48: 127-132.
  7. Frederick A. and Huda N. Campylobacterin poultry: Incidences and possible control measures. Research Journal of Microbiology, 2011; 6: 182-192.
  8. Ghafir Y., China B., Dierick K., Dezutter L., Daube G. A seven-year survey of Campylobacter contamination in meat at different production stages in Belgium. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2007; 116: 111-120.
  9. Gonzalez I., Grant K.A., Richardson P.T., Park S.F. and Collins M.D. Specific identification of the enteropathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli using PCR test based on the ceuEgene encoding a putative virulence determinant. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1997; 35: 759-763.
  10. Han K., Jang S.S., Choo E., Heu S. and Ryu S. Prevalence, genetic diversity, and antibiotic resistance patterns of Campylobacter jejuni from retail raw chickens in Korea. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2007; 114: 50-59.
  11. Hassanzadeh P, Motamedifar M. Occurence of Campylobacter jejuni in Shiraz, Southwest Iran. Med Princ Pract 2007; 16(1):59-62.
  12. Hussain I., Mahmood M.S., Akhtar M. and Khan A. Prevalence of Campylobacter species in meat, milk and other food commodities in Pakistan. Food Microbiology, 2007; 24: 219-222.
  13. Jamshidi A., Bassami M.R. and Farkhonddeh T. Isolation and identification of Campylobacterspp. and Campylobacter colifrom poultry carcasses by conventional culture method and multiplex PCR in Mashhad, Iran. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 2008; 9: 132-137.
  14. Kang Y.S., Cho Y.S., Yoon S.K., Yu M.A., Kim C.M., Lee J.O. et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coliisolated from raw chicken meat and human stools in Korea. Journal of Food Protection, 2006; 69: 2915-23.
  15. Mateo, E., Carcamo, J., Urquijo, M., Perales, I., Fernandez-Astorga, A. Evaluations of a PCR assay for the detection and identification of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in retail poultry products, Research in Microbiology, 2005; 156: 568-574.
  16. Rahimi E. and Ameri M. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw chicken, turkey, quail, partridge, and ostrich meat in Iran. Food Control, 2011; 22: 1165-70.
  17. Rahimi E. and Tajbakhsh E. Prevalence of Campylobacterspecies in poultry meat in the Esfahan city, Iran. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2008; 11: 257-262.
  18. Razavilar V.2002.Pathogenic Micriorganisms in Foods and Epidemiology Food Poisoning, University of Tehran Press, 2rd, 2431:103
  19. Sallam K.I. Prevalence of Campylobacter in chicken and chicken by-products retailed in Sapporo ares, Hokkaido, Japan. Food Control, 2007; 18: 1113-20.
  20. Shakerian A., Rokni N., Sharifzadeh A., Alagha S. and Talebian R. Campylobacter jejuna’s a potential pathogen in liver of broilers chickens in slaughtered & retail market broilers in Shahr-e-Kord, Iran. Iranian Journal of Food Sciences and Technology, 2005; 1: 43-50.
  21. Soltan Dallal M.M., Doyle M.P., Rezadehbashi M., DabiriH., Sanaei M., Modarresi S., et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella serotypes, Campylobacter and Yersiniaspp. Isolated from retail chicken and beef, Tehran, Iran. Food Control, 2010; 21: 388–392.
  22. Suzuki H. and Yamamoto S. Campylobacter contamination in retail poultry meats and by-products in Japan: A literature survey. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2009; 71(3): 255-261.
  23. Taremi M., Soltan Dallal M.M., Gachkar L., Moez Ardalan S., Zolfagharian K. and Zali M.R. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolated from retail raw chicken and beef meat, Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2006; 108: 401-403.
  24. Valdivieso-Garcia A., Harris K., Riche E., Campbell S., Jarvie A. and Popa M., et al. Novel Campylobacter isolation method using hydrophobic grid membrane filter and semisolid medium. Journal of Food Protection, 2007; 70: 355-362.
  25. Whyte P., McGill K., Cowley D., Madden RH. Moran L., Scates P., et al. Occurrence of Campylobacter in retail foods in Ireland. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2004; 95: 111-118.
  26. Yildirim M., Istanbulluoglu E. and Ayvali B. Prevalence and antibitoic susceptibility of thermophilic Campylobacter species in broiler chickens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Sciences, 2005; 29: 655-660.

Article Metrics

Article View: 3042

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2016. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.