Research Article | Open Access

Vidyavathi B. Chitharagi1, Kavana B.S.1, Morubagal Raghavendra Rao1 ,Ranjitha S. Gowda1, Rashmi P. Mahale1, Sowmya G.S.1 and Anitha T.K.2

Department of Microbiology, JSSMC, JSSAHER, S.S. Nagar, Mysore – 570 015, India.
2Department of Microbiology, Kanachur Medical College, Mangalore, India.
J Pure Appl Microbiol, 2019, 13 (1): 581-584 | Article Number: 5530

https://dx.doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.13.1.66 | © The Author(s). 2019 

Received: 23/01/2019| Accepted: 11/03/2019 | Published: 31/03/2019
Abstract

Beta Hemolytic Streptococci are the most causative agents of pharyngitis, tonsillitis and pyogenic skin infections, to severe invasive conditions like necrotizing fasciitis and meningitis. Though Group A is more predominant streptococci causing disease, Group B, Group C Streptococcus (GCS) and group G Streptococcus (GGS) Group F Streptococci are emerging pathogens. Development of antibiotic resistance among them is a major concern now. This study aimed to know serogroup of beta hemolytic Streptococci causing infection and to know antibiotic resistance pattern. Based on standard biochemical tests, beta hemolytic Streptococci were identified and serogrouping was done using commercial latex test kit. Antibiotic susceptibility was performed as per CLSI guidelines. Among 120 beta hemolytic Streptococci isolated, 63 consecutive Beta hemolytic Streptococci were subjected for serogrouping. Group A were 35(55.6%), 4 Group B, 9 Group C and F , 5 group G Streptococci.  Among the 63 isolates majority of isolates were from throat swab 21(33.3%) followed by pus 18 (28.5%). BHS from sputum were 8 and 7 from endotracheal aspirates. All the isolates were sensitive to penicillin, 27% of the BHS were resistance to erythromycin. Information regarding the prevalent Streptococci in local geographical area is of great importance as non GAS groups are associated with severe skin and soft tissue infections. Another major concern is antimicrobial resistance among these serogroups. Knowing antibiotic susceptibility patterns helps in selecting appropriate antibiotic for effective management of these clinical conditions.

Keywords

Beta haemolytic, Serogroup, Streptococci, resistance.

Introduction

Infections caused by beta haemolytic streptococci (BHS) range from mild, self limiting infections to the life threatening complications1. Lancefield’s Group A and B are the predominant streptococci causing infections. Emerging major pathogens now are Group C Streptococcus (GCS), group F and group G Streptococcus (GGS) which are associated with pharyngitis and other cutaneous infections. Development of antibiotic drug resistance among them is a major concern now. Group A have been associated with pyogenic and non pyogenic infections. Neonatal meningitis and pregnancy related infections are the major infections caused by Group B streptococci (GBS)2. Group F streptococci (GFS) are associated with suppurative infections3. Although resistance to penicillin in GAS is not documented, raising MIC value for penicillin has been reported and resistance to erythromycin, tetracyclines and other drugs have been on rise. Antimicrobial resistance among Non group A Streptococci are also increasing4. Thus, it is essential to know the serogroup of Streptococci causing infection and their antibiotic susceptibility to treat appropriately.

Aims and Objectives
To isolate, identify beta hemolytic Streptococci from clinical samples sent for culture and to test antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates.
To carry out Lancefield’s serogrouping on beta haemolytic streptococci.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was conducted in the department of Microbiology, JSS hospital from January 2017 to December 2017. Beta hemolytic Streptococci isolated from different clinical specimens were further identified by biochemical tests. Gram stain was performed on all the isolates. Isolates were subjected to biochemical tests such as catalase, PYR, bile esculin, hippurate hydrolysis and CAMP test for further identification of group of streptococci. Antibiotic discs such as bacitracin (0.04 units) and trimethoprim and Sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75µ) were used to identify Group A, group C and group G streptococci.

Lancefield’s serogrouping into A, B, C, D, F and G Streptococci was done using “PLASMATEC streptococcal grouping latex test kit, United Kingdom. The plasmatic Streptococcal test kit is a rapid latex system used for determination of the six clinical groups of haemolytic Streptococci. Test was performed and interpreted as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Beta haemolytic Streptococci were tested to know antibiotic susceptibility pattern. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the isolates was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar with 5% sheep blood by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Anitbiotic discs tested were penicillin (10Units), erythromycin (15µg), ciprofloxacin, linezolid (30µg), clindamycin (02µg), chloramphenicol (30µg), tetracycline (30µg), vancomycin(30µg) and ceftriaxone (30µg). Erythromycin resistance detected as per the standard protocol by placing erythromycin and clindamycin discs at 20mm apart

The plates are incubated in 5-10% CO2 at 37÷C for 24 hours, and observed for the zone of inhibition and interpreted as per CLSI recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 358 Streptococci were isolated from the total of 26,917 various clinical samples such as throat swabs, sputum, endotracheal secretions, broncho alveolar lavage, pus, blood, vaginal swab, urine and others. Of the 358 Streptococci, 156 were alpha haemolytic streptococci, 120 were beta haemolytic streptococci and 82 were non haemolytic streptococci. Among the 120 BHS, 63 consecutive Beta hemolytic Streptococci were subjected for Lancefields serogrouping. By Latex agglutination serogrouping, 35(55.6%) were identified as Group A, 4 as Group B, 5 were group G Streptococci and 9 each detected as Group C and F. Age of the patient ranged from 1 to 95 years of which maximum belonged to age group of 21-30 years 13 (20.6%) followed by age group of 61-70 with 12(19.1%). Out of 63 BHS 30(47.6%) were isolated from female patients and 33(52.4%) from male patients.

Among the 63 BHS, maximum isolates were from throat swab 21(33.3%) followed by pus 18 (28.5%). Eight BHS were from sputum and 7 from endotracheal secretions. Among the 63 isolates, the highest of 51 (81%) samples were isolated from inpatients and 12(19%) were outpatient department. In Antibiotic susceptibility test pattern for the identified serogroups tested showed 100 % susceptibility to penicillin, 60 (95.2%) as sensitive to vancomycin. 46 (73%) of the isolates were susceptible to erythromycin. Fifty nine isolates (93.7%) were sensitive to both linezolid and ceftriaxone, 57(90.5%) were sensitive to Ciprofloxacin. Susceptibility to tetracycline, clindamycin and chloramphenicol was seen in 55 (87.3%), 54 (85%), and 53 (84.1%) respectively.

Discussion

The beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) of various Lancefield groups are known to cause various systemic and localized infections worldwide. Group A Streptococci is known to cause serious complications like rheumatic fever, acute glomerulonephritis, toxic shock syndrome, necrotising fasciitis and scarlet fever in addition to milder infections. Similar infections can also be caused by Group C and Group G. The occurrence of infections by non GAS is also being increasingly reported from elsewhere in the world and is now being the field of interest in the recent studies5.

In the present study, most prevalent serogroup was Group A Streptococci (55.6%) followed by GCS and GFS group each with 9/63 (14.3%). A study conducted in north part of Karnataka reported GAS as predominant BHS than others where it accounted for 58.82%6. Similar kind of study among pharyngitis patients in Iraq showed, 6.2% of their isolates belonging to group C and Group F7. While in a study by S. Rantala in Finland a predominance of GGS to GAS was recorded8.

In the study, most of the BHS were isolated from patients with age group 21-30 years with 13/63(20.6%) and 61-70 years with 12/63(19.1%). BHS were isolated from males predominantly than females similar to other studies9,10.

Among the 21 throat swabs sent for culture, GAS was isolated in 16/21 (76.19%) and GCS in 5/21 (23.81%) samples. Similar observation was made in study conducted in Salem and other parts of India11,12 An analogous study conducted in Assam, showed a high prevalence rate of GFS than GAS in throat swab cultures13. Another study by Majumdhar et al reported very low prevalence of GGS with only 4 in 1165 isolates14. This indicates that the prevalence of specific Lancefield groups of BHS can vary from place to place.

Present study showed GBS colonization in vagina in one pregnant woman. GBS causing skin and soft tissue infection accounted for 3/4 (4.7%) in the study whereas in other studies a rate of 11% has been documented10.

Study demonstrated 100% susceptibility to penicillin among all the BHS isolates which is in concordance with the most of the studies conducted worldwide5,6. In the study, 27% resistance was observed to erythromycin. Macrolide resistance has been on rise and our results are comparable to recent resistance reports from India4,10. The susceptibility to vancomycin was 95.2% by disc diffusion though was not confirmed by MIC testing. Study conducted in Andhra Pradesh, showed sensitive rate of 91.11% to vancomycin which shows comparatively increasing resistance rate in the BHS11. Susceptibility to linezolid and cipro-floxacin was more than 90% while published studies have reported 100% sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, and linezolid9,10. And penicillin remained as the most common antibiotic used for treatment of BHS in our study. Linezolid, was the second most antibiotic used for the treatment either alone or with the combination with other antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

The beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) of various Lancefield groups are associated wide variety of systemic infections worldwide. The incidence of non GAS are also increasing across the world causing different infections and antibiotic resistance detection should be routinely employed for early identification of drug resistance which further helps in preventing misuse of antibiotics and better management of patient.

Acknowledgments

None

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References
  1. Shakibaie, M., Forootanfar, H., Golkari, Y., Mohammadi-Khorsand, T., and Shakibaie, M. R. Anti-biofilm activity of biogenic selenium nanoparticles and selenium dioxide against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Proteus mirabilis. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015; 29:235-241.
  2. Mohammed, G. J., Kadhim, M. J., and Hameed, I. H. Proteus species: Characterization and herbal antibacterial: A review. International J Pharmacog and Phytochem Res, 2016; 8(11):1844-1854.
  3. Stankowska, D., Kwinkowski, M., and Kaca, W. Quantification of Proteus mirabilis virulence factors and modulation by acylated homoserine lactones. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2008; 41(3):243-253.‏
  4. Howery, K. E., Clemmer, K. M., and Rather, P. N. The Rcs regulon in Proteus mirabilis: implications for motility, biofilm formation, and virulence. Curr Genetics, 2016; 62(4):775-789.
  5. Ouda, S. M. Some nanoparticles effects on Proteus sp. and Klebsiella sp. isolated from water. Am J Infect Dis Microbiol, 2014; 2(1):4-10.
  6. Cestari ,S.E., Ludovico,M.S., Martins,F.H., Rocha,S.P.D., Elias,W.P. and Pelayo. J.S. Molecular Detection of HpmA and HlyA Hemolysin of Uropathogenic Proteus mirabilis. Curr Microbiol., 2013; 67:703–707.‏‏
  7. Rozalski, A., Torzewska, A., Moryl, M., Kwil, I., Maszewska, A., Ostrowska, K., .and Staחzek, P. Proteus sp.–an opportunistic bacterial pathogen–classification, swarming growth, clinical significance and virulence factors. Folia Biologica et Oecologica, 2012; 8(1):1-17.
  8. Uphoff, T. and Welch, R. Nucleotide sequencing of the Proteus mirabilis calcium independent hemolysin genes (hpmA and hpmB) reveals sequence similarity with Serratia marcescens hemolysin genes (shlA and shlB). J Bacteriol., 1990; 172:1206–1216.
  9. Jumaily, E. F., and Zgaer, S. H. Characterization and molecular detection of purified Proteus mirabilis pmbs 41 alpha-hemolysin. Basrah J Veter Res, 2016; 15(3).
  10. Liaw, S. J., Lai, H. C., Ho, S. W., Luh, K. T., and Wang, W. B. Role of RsmA in the regulation of swarming motility and virulence factor expression in Proteus mirabilis. J Med Microbiol, 2003; 52(1):19-28
  11. Swihart, K. G., and Welch, R. A. The HpmA hemolysin is more common than HlyA among Proteus isolates. Infect and Immun, 1990; 58(6):1853-1860.‏
  12. Sosa, V.; Schlapp, G.and Zunino, P. Proteus mirabilis isolates of differentorigins do not show correlation with virulence attributes and can colonize the urinary tract of mice. Microbiol, 2006; 152(7):2149-2157.
  13. AL-Jumaa, M. H.; Bnyan, I. A. and Al-Khafaji, J. K. Bacteriological and Molecular Study of Some Isolates of Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris in Hilla Province. A thesis for the Degree of Master of Science in Microbiology. College of Medicine, University of Babylon, 2011.
  14. Mishara, M.; Thakar, Y.S. and Pathak, A.A. Haemagglutination, haemolysin production and serum resistance of Proteus and related species isolated from clinical sources, Indian J Med Microbiol. 2001; 19(2):5-11
  15. Abdul-Lateef, L. A. Sequencing of Proteus Toxic Agglutinin (Pta) Gene in Proteus Mirablis and Cytotoxic Effect of Pta on Human Colon Cancer Cell and Human Kidney Cell. J Global Pharma Technol, 2017; 9(9).
  16. Mordi, R. M., and Momoh, M. I. Incidence of Proteus species in wound infections and their sensitivity pattern in the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. African J Biotechnol, 2009; 8(5).
  17. Fraser GM, Claret L, Furness R, Gupta S, Hughes C. Swarming-coupled expression of the Proteus mirabilis hpmBA haemolysin operon. Microbiol, 2002; 148:2191–2201.
  18. Strauss, E. J., Ghori, N., and Falkow, S. An Edwardsiella tarda strain containing a mutation in a gene with homology to shlB and hpmB is defective for entry into epithelial cells in culture. Infect and Immun, 1997; 65(9):3924-3932.
  19. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., and Neiderheiser, J. Behavioral genetics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
  20. Li, W., Raoult, D., and Fournier, P. E. Bacterial strain typing in the genomic era. FEMS Microbiol Revs, 2009; 33(5):892-916.
  21. Hadfield, J. D., and Nakagawa, S. General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J Evolution Biol, 2010; 23(3), 494-508.
  22. Case, R. J., Boucher, Y., Dahllof, I., Holmstrצm, C., Doolittle, W. F., and Kjelleberg, S. Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Appl Environmen Microbiol, 2007; 73(1):278-288.
  23. Ghebremedhin, B., Layer, F., Konig, W., and Konig, B. Genetic classification and distinguishing of Staphylococcus species based on different partial gap, 16S rRNA, hsp60, rpoB, sodA, and tuf gene sequences. J Clinic Microbiol, 2008; 46(3):1019-1025.
  24. Michelim, L., Muller, G., Zacaria, J., Delamare, A. P. L., Costa, S. O. P. D., and Echeverrigaray, S. Comparison of PCR-based molecular markers for the characterization of Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates. Brazilian J Infect Dis, 2008; 12(5), 423-429.
  25. Ma, R., Wu, X., Wang, R., Wang, C., and Zhu, J. Identification and phylogenetic analysis of a bacterium isolated from the cloaca of Chinese alligator. African J Biotechnol, 2008; 7(13).
  26. Brenner, D. J., Staley, J. T., and Krieg, N. R. Classification of Procaryotic Organisms and the Concept of Bacterial Speciation. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria, 2015; 1-9.

Article Metrics

Article View: 2738

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.