Research Article | Open Access
Fayez Althobaiti
Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif, KSA.
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2020;14(3):2165-2171 | Article Number: 6571 | © The Author(s). 2020
Received: 05/08/2020 | Accepted: 11/09/2020 | Published: 22/09/2020

The recent increasing use of artificial antibiotics has prompted an expansion in resistant strains and high site reactions. Medicinal plants have for quite some time been utilized as traditional medicine to treat pathogenic bacteria. In such manner, consistently numerous scientists are sending a range of plant’s secondary compounds to the customer advertise for the treatment of human illnesses. Accordingly, the distinguishing proof of plant spices with antimicrobial impacts can assist with delivering new medications with a wide range of impacts. The aim of the present research was to examine the ability of ethanolic leaves extracts of Rosmarinus officinalis plant as antibacterial agent against the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli. The zone of inhibition increased with increase in concentration of the test solution. Higher activity of ethanolic extract was found against S. aureus (2.4 cm) than E. coli (1.8 cm). In addition, the repetitive element PCR (Rep-PCR) significantly showed that several genetic numbers of polymorphic bands were observed in S. aureus and E. coli treated bacteria with leaves extracts and not observed in the control. These results indicate that these extracts have a genotoxicity effect on the two bacterial genomes. The obtained results demonstrate that R. officinalis can be used as a potential source of antibacterial and genotoxicity factors.


Rosemary, Re-PCR markers, gene mutations, S. aureus, E. coli


One of the concerns in the biomedical and medical sciences is the resistance of bacteria to chemical drugs, in cases, where drug resistance is created by changing the drug to fight against pathogenic bacteria1. After the discovery of penicillin in the 40s, and its use in treatment, new antibiotics were introduced every day to treat infections2. The result was the expansion of the clinical use of natural and synthetic antibiotics in the treatment of clinical infections3. Nevertheless, as advances in the production of new chemicals and various antibiotics began to take place, the harmful effects of these drugs gradually began to appear, and since the 1950s numerous pathogenic bacteria have shown resistance to antibiotics, which is still expanding4. Therefore, there is a new approach to reduce the spread of pathogenic microbes by using alternative and natural methods such as using essential oils or plant extracts5. For many years, natural medications, especially medicinal plants, have been the basis and even in some cases the only treatment, while their raw materials have been used in the pharmaceutical industry6. Additionally, the medicinal plants have several characteristics for using to treat bacterial diseases, as natural, low-risk and inexpensive compared to synthetic antibiotics7-9. In addition, these herbal remedies are more popular with people10-12.

The role of natural products in drug production is increasing, not only when biologically active compounds are used directly as therapeutic drugs, but also when used as raw materials for drug synthesis, or as a model the base is used for new biologically active compounds13-15. Studies show that only about 10% of the 250,000 species of plants studied worldwide16. Therefore, the use of herbal drugs as an alternative to chemical drugs and antibiotics was investigated in many research studies17-19.

Rosmarinus officinalis (Rosemary) belongs to the Lamiacea family and is popular as a spice and medicinal plant in many countries. Rosemary is listed in the World Series of Weeds, but due to its popularity and therapeutic properties, it is in the top priority20. It has antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, antidiabetic, antiinflammatory, analgesic, antioxidant, and endemic effects on the Mediterranean and Asian region21-23. The antimicrobial properties of rosemary are due to phenolic compounds: carnosol, rosmarinic acid, caffeic acid, flavonoids including diosmin, luteolin, zincquanine, and monoprenes such as camphor, cineole and borneol24.

Fresh and dried rosemary leaves are used for their distinctive aroma in food or herbal tea cooking, while rosemary extracts are commonly used as natural antioxidants that help a person’s healthy life25. Rosemary is one of the spices that has the highest levels of antioxidants and can help fight bacteria and cancer26. Antioxidant properties of rosemary extracts vary due to genetic and growth conditions, region and geographical origin, climatic conditions, extraction process, main plant quality and date of harvest27. While the immune-boosting properties of the rosemary plant are sufficiently effective, the plant also works well against bacterial infections, especially those that occur in the stomach. Also, rosemary is associated with the prevention of Staphylococcus infection, which kills thousands every year28.

The aim of the present research was to investigate the antibacterial activity and genotoxicity effect of the rosemary leave extracts against the pathogenic bacteria of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains
Two pathogenic bacteria, S. aureus TU-23 and E. coli TU-39, were used in the present study. Both bacteria were identified by 16S rRNA gene as previously reported29. The PCR reaction was achieved as follow; 2 μl of template DNA (about 100 ng), 2X Promega PCR Master Mix (Promega®, Lithuania, USA), 10 pmol of specific universal 16s rRNA primers and deionized distilled water (up to 25 μl). The PCR product, about 1260 bp, was purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). The resulted sequences of 16S rRNA were aligned with other known 16Sr RNA sequences in GenBank using MEGA program version 7.10 to generate a phylogeny tree.

Plant materials
Rosemary plants (Rosmarinus officinalis) were collected from the vicinity of Taif, Saudi Arabia on October 2019. Then the plants were washed with running water and the leaves were cut into small pieces, then leaved in sun light for three days to dry and the grinded by blender. The powder of leaved was extracted in 70% ethanol to get the crude extract as previously described29.

Determination of antibacterial activity of rosemary leaves extracts
The agar-well diffusion method was used for investigating the antibacterial activity of rosemary leaves extracts29. The two bacteria were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium for 13 h and harvested at 10000 rpm for 5 min. Then, pellets were resuspended in sterile water and diluted to about 100 CFU/ml. An aliquot of 200 μl of the resulting bacteria was mixed with 50 ml of nutrient agar (NA) medium and then poured into petri dish. Wells with a diameter of 4.6 mm were cut from the agar with a sterile borer. Aliquots of 200 and 300 µl dilution of the leaves extract were used, as well as water as negative control and Streptomycin as positive control at 1.2 µg/ml. The plates were kept at 37°C for 24 h. Antibacterial activity was investigated by measuring the diameter of the inhibition zone (DIZ) of the tested bacteria as previously mentioned29.

Repetitive-PCR (Rep-PCR) analysis technique
The two bacteria were growth on 5 ml liquid LB medium with different concentrations of rosemary leave extract (0, 10, 20, 30, 50 and 75 ml of the leave extract dilution) at 37°C for 24 h. Next, genomic DNA was extracted using the procedure elucidated by the manufactured (Jena Bioscience, Germany) and Rep-PCR technique was performed using five Rep-PCR primers as followed:

Rep 18 (5’-ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CG-3’), Rep 19 (5’-AGA GAG AGA GAG AGA GTT-3’), Rep 29 (5’- ACA CAC ACA CAC ACA CT -3’), BOX A1 (5’- CTA CGG CAA GGC GAC GCT GAC G-3’), and (GTG)5 (5’-GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG-3’). PCR was achieved in total volume of 25 μl that containing 2 μl (about 50 ng) of genomic DNA, 12.5 μl of Go Taq® Green Master Mix (Promega, USA), 20 pmol of each primer, and deionized distilled water (up to 25 μl).


The phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA of the two pathogenic bacteria are presented in Fig. 1. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the two species were compared with other S. aureus and E coli strains that stored in GenBank database. It was documented that ribosomal genes are significantly applicable for classified bacterial species30. When re-constructing phylogenetic tree of bacteria species, sequencing of 16S rRNA has been commonly used. As a result, S. aureus and E. coli are located in same species that collected from GenBank (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. The phylogenetic relationship tree of E. coli TU-23 and S. aureus TU-39, which are considered in the present study with related genera, based on the sequence of 16S rRNA gene sequences using neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7 software.

The antibacterial activity of rosemary leaves extracts against S. aureus and E coli was measured by evaluating the diffusion method in agar. This method allows for better diffusion of extracts in the NA medium and thereby enhances the interaction between the extract and bacteria. The results exhibited that the rosemary leave extracts with amount of 200 or 300 ml dilution of the leaves extract was active and stopped the growth of negative and positive-gram bacteria (Table 1, Fig. 2). Maximum imbibition zone was noticed towards S. aureus (24 mm), while, against E. coli was 18 mm (Table 1). This suggests that the rosemary leaves extracts displayed a wide-ranging activity since it was active towards both bacterial species. Similar data were obtained previously16,21,24.

Table (1):
Antibacterial activities of rosemary leaves extracts against E. coli and S. aureus.

 Isolates Diameter of inhibition zone (mm)
Rosemary leaves extracts (µl) Streptomycin
200 300 
S. aureus            20 24 22
E. coli 15 18 21


Fig. 2. The inhibition zone of rosemary leaves extracts against E. coli (A) and S. aureus (B). 1 = 200 ml dilution of the leaves extract, 2 = 300 ml dilution of the leaves extract, 3 = 200 ml 70% ethanol, 4 = distilled water as a negative control, 5= 1.2 μg/ml of Streptomycin.

The results also designated that the ethanol was a good solvent for extracting essential substances from the rosemary leaves. This result is in agreement with the conclusion that stated by Abramovic et al.31 and Gazwi32 as the ethanol was the best solvent to extract the phenolic compounds from rosemary leaves.

The high antimicrobial activity of rosemary leaves extracts may be either due to the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, saponins, tannins, steroids, carnosic acid and rosmarinic acid23,26. Phenolic compounds and flavonoids are recognised for their antibacterial and antifungal properties29. Also, there is some evidence that minor chemical components that located in rosemary leaves have a significant effect as antibacterial activity33.

Table (2):
Numbers of polymorphic and monomorphic loci of each Rep-PCR primer and percentage of polymorphism in both bacteria that treated with different concentrations of rosemary leaves extracts.

Primer Name Total loci Polymorphic loci Polymorphis loci
E. coli S. aureus
2 3 4 5 6* 2 3 4 5 6*
Rep 18 11 6 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 2 3 1
Rep 19 13 10 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 1
Rep 29 10 9 3 3 1 2 1 3 2 4 3 4
BOX A1 12 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(GTG)5 9 5 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Total 55 32

*2 to 6 = 10, 20, 30, 50 and 75µl dilution of the leaves extract.

To measure bacterial DNA stabilization, both bacteria strains were treated with five dilutions of rosemary leaf extracts ranging from 10 to 75 µl. Rep-PCR data showed that many of the polymorphic sites that presented in E. coli and S. aureus treated strains compared to those from untreated bacteria (Table 2, Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2, rosemary leaves extract produced several polymorphic loci in treated bacteria. Also, several positive or negative polymorphic loci were present or absent in treated bacteria with the rosemary leaves extracts. These results clearly indicate that the rosemary leaves have the ability to induce several point mutations as a result of the deletion or addition of nucleotides as evidenced by the disappearance or appearance of many genetic sites and, consequently, the change in the primers matching sites compared to control (Fig. 3). These results are consistent with the results that previously found29. Some of the chemical ingredients in rosemary extracts may act as interaction factor or can generate free radicals that interact with genomic DNA to produce deletions in many nucleotides. Similar data were previously mentioned with different medicinal plants34,35.

Fig. 3. Rep-PCR profile of the E. coil and S. aureus treated with five different concentrations of rosemary leaves extracts. 1 = non treated cells, 2 to 6 = 10, 20, 30, 50 and 75 ml dilution of the leaves extract using five Rep-PCR markers. M: is 100 bp DNA ladder.


The antibacterial activities of rosemary leaf extract can be shown as biochemical compounds that act in treated bacteria as a genetic toxin or mutagenic agent that causes addition or deletion in several DNA nucleotides. The ability to develop antibacterial agents from medicinal plants seems satisfactory, because, in addition to this activity, they may produce fewer side effects and act on strains resistant to conventional antibiotics.




This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

All datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

  1. Khameneh B, Iranshahy M, Soheili V, Bazzaz BSF. Review on plant antimicrobials: a mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:118.
  2. Mobaiyen H, Sales AJ, Sayyahi J. Evaluating antimicrobial effects of centaurea plant’s essential oil on pathogenic bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli isolated from clinical specimens. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2016;5(4):479-487.
  3. Tunc K, Hos A, Gunes B. Investigation of antibacterial properties of Cotinus coggygria from Turkey. Pol J Environ Stud. 2013;22(5):1559-1561.
  4. Jafari-Sales A, Shahniani A, Fathi R, Malekzadeh P, Mobaiyen H, Bonab FR. Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oil of Ziziphora clinopodioides and Achillea wilhelmsii on Antibiotic-resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Intern Med Med Investig J. 2017;2(2):49-56.
  5. Zainab A, Bhat R, Acharya S, Yende A, Prajna PS, Padyana S. Studies on antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Pajanelia longifolia (Willd.) Schumann. J Res Obes. 2013; Article ID 756484.
  6. Jafari-Sales A, Jafari B, Sayyahi J, Zohoori-Bonab T. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of ethanolic extract of Malva neglecta and Althaea officinalis L. On antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Today’s World. 2015;4(2):58-62.
  7. Sales AJ, Bagherizadeh Y, Malekzadeh P. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effects of Essential Oil of Reseda lutea L. on Pathogenic Bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Escherichia coli. Arch Clin Microbiol. 2017;8(3):1-5.
  8. Iscan G, Kirimer N, Kurkcuoglu M, Baser HC, Demirci F. Antimicrobial screening of Mentha piperita essential oils. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(14):3943-3946.
  9. Jafari-Sales A, Hossein-Nezhad P. Antimicrobial effects of Rosmarinus officinalis methanolic extract on Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in laboratory conditions. J Med Chem Sci. 2019;3:103-108.
  10. Canli K, Yetgin A, Benek A, Bozyel ME , Altuner EM. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity Screening of Ethanol Extract of Lavandula stoechas and Investigation of Its Biochemical Composition. Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmceutical Science. 2019; 2019: Article ID 3201458.
  11. Mahboubi M, Haghi G. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of Mentha pulegium L. essential oil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;119(2):325-327.
  12. Boskabady MH, Alitaneh S, Alavinezhad A. Carum copticum L.: A herbal medicine with various pharmacological effects. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:569087.
  13. Jafarpour M, Golparvar AR, Lotfi A. Antibacterial activity of essential oils from Thymus vulgaris, Trachyspermum ammi and Mentha aquatica against Erwinia carotovora in vitro. J. Herbal Drugs. 2013;4(3):115-118.
  14. Gilani SR, Mahmood Z, Hussain M. Preliminary evaluation of antimicrobial activity of cream formulated with essential oil of Trachyuspermum ammi. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2013;26(5):893-896.
  15. Mahboubi M, Kazempour N. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Satureja hortensis and Trachyspermum copticum essential oil. Iran J Microbiol. 2011;3(4):194-200.
  16. Jawad AM, Allawi AK, Ewadh HM. Essential oils of rosemary as antimicrobial agent against three types of bacteria. Med J Babylon. 2018;15(1):53-6.
  17. Sales AJ, Shadbad NN, Kaleybar, VP. The Investigation of the Antibacterial effects of Ethanol extract of Cichorium intybus L. on Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci. 2015;4:161-164.
  18. Sales AJ, Bolouri P. Evaluation of the antimicrobial effects of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. on some gram positive and gram negative pathogenic bacteria in laboratory conditions. Jorjani Biomed J. 2018;6(4):78-84.
  19. Cowan MM. Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(4):564-582.
  20. Randall RP. A Global Compendium of Weeds. Second edition, Perth, Australia: Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 2012;1124.
  21. Stojiljkovic J, Trajchev M, Nakov D, Petrovska M. Antibacterial activities of rosemary essential oils and their components against pathogenic bacteria. Adv Cytol Pathol. 2018;3(4):93-96.
  22. Cheung S, Tai J. Anti-proliferative and antioxidant properties of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis). Oncol Rep. 2007;17(6):1525-1531.
  23. Yesil-Celiktas O, Sevimli C, Bedir E, Vardar-Sukan F. Inhibitory effects of rosemary extracts, carnosic acid and rosmarinic acid on the growth of various human cancer cell lines. Plant Foods Hum Nut. 2010;65(2):158-163.
  24. Peng Y, Yuan J, Liu F, Ye J. Determination of active components in rosemary by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;39(3-4):431-7.
  25. Gupta R, Kumar S, Khurana R. Essential oils and mastitis in dairy animals: a review. Haryana Vet. 2020;59(SI):1-9
  26. Moreno S., Scheyer T, Romano CS, Vojnov AA. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of rosemary extracts linked to their polyphenol composition. Free Radic Res. 2006;40(2):223-231.
  27. Andrade JM, Faustino C, Garcia C, Ladeiras D, Reis CP, Rijo P. Rosmarinus officinalis L.: an update review of its phytochemistry and biological activity. Future Sci OA. 2018;4(4):FSO283.
  28. Habtemariam S. The therapeutic potential of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) diterpenes for Alzheimer’s disease. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:2680409.
  29. Gaber A, Hassan MM, Dessoky ES, Attia AO. In vitro Antimicrobial Comparison of Taif and Egyptian Pomegranate Peels and Seeds Extracts. J App Biol Biotech. 2015;3(2):012-017.
  30. Alsanie WF, Felemban EM, Shafie A, et al. The Antimicrobial Resistance and Prevalence of Enterococcus Species in Saudi Arabia. J Pure Appl Microbio. 2019;13(4):2461-2470.
  31. Abramovic H, Terpinc P, Generalic I, et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of extracts obtained from rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and vine (Vitis vinifera) leaves. Croat J Food Sci Technol. 2012;4(1):1-8.
  32. Gazwi HSS, Mahmoud ME, Hamed MM. Antimicrobial activity of rosemary leaf extracts and efficacy of ethanol extract against testicular damage caused by 50-Hz electromagnetic field in albino rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:15798-15805.
  33. Burt S. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in food – a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;94(3):223-53.
  34. Baeshin NA, Qari SH, Sabir JSM, ALhejin AM. Biochemical and Molecular Evaluation of Genetic Effects of Rhazya stricta (Decne) Leafs Extract on Aspergillus terreus. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2008;15:25-33.
  35. Ansah C, Khan A, Gooderham NJ. In vitro genotoxicity of the West African antimalarial herbal Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and its major alkaloid cryptolepine. Toxicology. 2014;208(1):141-147.

Article Metrics

Article View: 2243

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.