ISSN: 0973-7510

E-ISSN: 2581-690X

Review Article | Open Access
Harendra K. Thakur1,2, Bansidhar Tarai2 , Aradhana Bhargava3, Sonu K. Agarwal2, Pankaj Soni4, Sudhakar Kancharla5, Prachetha Kolli6, Gowtham Mandadapu5 and Manoj Kumar Jena1
1Department of Biotechnology, School of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India.
2Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
3Establishment and Strengthening NCDC Branches, New Admin Building, National Centre for Disease Control Dte. GHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of India, 22-Shamnath Marg, Civil Lines, Delhi, India.
4Department of Internal Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
5Devansh Lab Werks, 234 Aquarius Drive, Homewood, AL 35209, USA.
6Microgen Health Inc., 14225 Sullyfield Cir Suite E, Chantilly, VA 20151, USA.
Article Number: 9389 | © The Author(s). 2024
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2024;18(3):1391-1412. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.18.3.02
Received: 18 March 2024 | Accepted: 20 May 2024 | Published online: 12 July 2024
Issue online: September 2024
Abstract

Hospitalized patients on mechanical ventilation are at high-risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), making early and accurate diagnosis essential for the best possible treatment outcomes. This review examined various laboratory techniques, such as aerobic cultures, Gram’s stain, and molecular techniques, to assess how well they diagnose VAP.  We have done search strategies using Google Scholar, Medline Complete, and PubMed. Extensive statistical tools were utilized to examine studies and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory results. Multiplex PCR was superior to Gram’s stain and culture methods in terms of sensitivity (92%) and specificity (86%). On the other hand, Gram’s stain showed the highest specificity (78.9%) and the lowest sensitivity (74.6%). The results of semi-quantitative, quantitative, enrichment culture showed a lower specificity (75.97%) but a moderate sensitivity (78.5%). The most accurate diagnostic approach for VAP, according to a meta-analysis, was multiplex PCR-based testing, closely followed by culture methods. Beyond separate tests, multiplex PCR, culture, and Gram’s stain combination increased sensitivity. Prompt and precise VAP diagnosis is essential for efficient treatment. With possible improvements through combination diagnostic techniques, multiplex PCR remains the most accurate diagnostic tool. However, more investigation is necessary to improve and certify VAP diagnostic instruments.

Keywords

Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, Pathogens, Multiplex PCR, Gram’s Stain, Microbiological Culture

Article Metrics

Article View: 694

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.