Research Article | Open Access
David Christianto , Ni Made Mertaniasih, Ariani Permatasari, Priyo Budi Purwono, Pepy Dwi Endraswari and Atika
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Article Number: 10740 | © The Author(s). 2025
J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2025;19(4):3095-3105. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.19.4.51
Received: 04 July 2025 | Accepted: 19 November 2025 | Published online: 08 December 2025
Issue online: December 2025
Abstract

Rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) remains a major public health concern, and is characterized by diagnostic challenges and suboptimal treatment success. To better understand the factors influencing disease burden and outcomes, the present study investigated the clinical, demographic, radiological, and molecular characteristics of patients in a high-burden tertiary hospital in Indonesia. A cross-sectional study involving adult patients diagnosed with RR-TB at Dr. Soetomo General Hospital (Surabaya, Indonesia) was conducted to analyze clinical symptoms, comorbidities, radiographic findings, treatment regimens, and laboratory data, including sputum smear grades and IS6110–IS1081 cycle threshold (CT) values. Among 55 patients with RR-TB (mean age 45.1 years; 60% male), IS6110–IS1081 CT values exhibited significant inverse associations with the Modified Bandim TB Score (p = 0.002) and chest pain (p = 0.003), indicating higher bacterial burden in more symptomatic patients. CT values were also negatively correlated with sputum smear scores (r = -0.342; p = 0.011). Treatment failure was independently associated with anemia (odds ratio [OR] 13.2, p = 0.023) and a long-course regimen (OR 7.3, p = 0.026). A higher bacterial burden, as reflected by lower IS6110–IS1081 CT values, was associated with greater disease severity and chest pain. Anemia and long-course regimens independently predicted treatment failure, highlighting the need for the early detection of patients at high risk and optimized treatment strategies for RR-TB management.

Keywords

Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis, Cycle Threshold Value, Sputum Smear, Molecular Diagnostics

Introduction

Rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) is a critical global health challenge due to its diagnostic complexity and poor treatment outcomes. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), the causative agent of TB, primarily spreads through the inhalation of infected aerosols. In the lungs, MTB is phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages and forms granulomas, which can reactivate under immunocompromised conditions.1,2 One-quarter of the global population is infected, with 6.9 million pulmonary TB cases reported in 2023, of which 5.5% exhibited drug resistance, including 159,684 RR-TB and 28,982 pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR)/XDR cases.2

Drug-resistant TB leads to severe clinical manifestations and high mortality, particularly among vulnerable groups.3,4 In 2021, RR-TB accounted for approximately 191,000 deaths (World Health Organization [WHO], 2022). Indonesia remains among the countries with the highest RR-TB burden, where treatment was initiated in only 62% of confirmed cases in 2022, and treatment success was merely 51%.5 Rifampicin resistance, driven mainly by rpoB gene mutations altering the RNA polymerase β-subunit,6 results in longer, more toxic, and less effective therapy.7

Although culture remains the gold-standard diagnostic method, its complexity limits its use in low-resource settings.8 Sputum smear microscopy, while rapid, has limited sensitivity (78.6%) and requires skilled technicians.9,10 The GeneXpert Ultra assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) offers higher sensitivity (131-250 colony-forming units/mL) and simultaneously detects MTB and rifampicin resistance.11,12 It also provides cycle threshold (CT) values reflecting the bacterial DNA load, with lower CT values indicating higher bacillary burden.13,14

Higher sputum smear scores have been associated with greater disease severity15; however, their correlation with the clinical and molecular features of RR-TB remains underexplored, particularly in Indonesia. As such, the present study investigated the relationship between sputum smear score, IS6110–IS1081 CT values, and clinical findings among patients diagnosed with RR-TB at Dr. Soetomo Hospital, (Surabaya, Indonesia) to support improved diagnostic interpretation and treatment outcomes.

Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study, with a descriptive–analytic design, investigated the associations between sputum smear scores, IS6110–IS1081 CT values, and the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with RR-TB. This study was conducted at the Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, using data collected between January 2023 and April 2025. Ethics approval was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of the Dr. Soetomo General Hospital (Ethical Clearance No. 1980/LOE/301.4.2/V/2025). Because this study used anonymized secondary data from medical records, requirements for individual informed consent were waived. The Ethics Committee approved the use of patient records and waived the requirement for written consent because no direct patient contact or intervention occurred. Data extraction from medical records was performed once outside the patients’ treatment period in accordance with institutional data protection policies.

The study population included all adult (≥18 years of age) patients diagnosed with RR-TB who were treated during the study period. Patients were enrolled consecutively if they had a confirmed diagnosis of RR-TB according to the GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay and complete medical records, including sputum smear results, IS6110 and IS1081 CT values, and relevant clinical and radiological data. Patients with incomplete data and those who died before treatment initiation were excluded.

All CT values were obtained using the GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra platform operated under standardized laboratory procedures and environmental conditions. For each patient, individual CT values for the IS6110 and IS1081 targets were recorded separately, as reported by the system. These values were subsequently tabulated and analyzed to evaluate their associations with clinical, bacteriological, and radiological parameters, with no averaging or transformation performed before analysis. Clinical data, including demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, laboratory results, radiological findings, and treatment regimens and outcomes, were collected prospectively. The primary variables of interest were sputum smear scores and IS6110–IS1081 CT values, which were used as indicators of bacterial burden. The independent variables included demographic, clinical, and radiological profiles, as well as treatment-related factors.

The Modified Bandim TB Score was used to assess disease severity. The original Bandim TB Score comprised 13 items (each scored 1 point; maximum 13 points) covering cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, chest pain, night sweats, anemic conjunctiva, tachycardia, positive auscultation findings, axillary temperature > 37 °C, body mass index (BMI) BMI <18 kg/m2, BMI <16 kg/m2, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) <220 mm, and MUAC <200 mm. In this study, MUAC was not measured; therefore, the maximum possible score was 11. The total scores were categorized as follows: 0-5, severity classification (SC) I (mild); 6-7, SC II (moderate); and 8-11, SC III (severe). For analytical purposes, scores of 6-11 were classified as “moderate-to-severe”.

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Non-parametric tests, including chi-squared, Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Spearman’s correlation, were used for bivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was performed using linear regression for the predictors of CT values and logistic regression for the determinants of treatment failure. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Given the modest sample size, no formal power analysis was performed, which may be considered a limitation of the study. Multivariate models were interpreted cautiously to minimize overfitting and to account for potential confounders, including disease severity (Modified Bandim TB Score) and radiological features such as cavity formation.

RESULTS

Data from 55 patients who were diagnosed with RR-TB and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in this study. The mean patient age was 45.1 years, with the largest proportion falling within the 46-65-years’ age group (54.5%), and the majority were male (60%). The mean height and weight were 159.1 cm and 51.5 kg, respectively, with a mean BMI of 20.5 kg/m²; more than one-half of patients (56.4%) had a normal BMI. Most patients (74.5%) had newly diagnosed TB. Diabetes mellitus was the most prevalent comorbidity (52.7%), followed by HIV (9.1%). The most commonly administered treatment regimens were BPALM (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin [47.3%]) and short-course (61.8%) regimens. Treatment outcomes were distributed as follows: cure (30.9%); death (16.4%); and loss to follow-up (10.9%) (Table 1).

Table (1):
Characteristics of Patients with Rifampicin-Resistant Pulmonary TB (n = 55)

Variable
Value
Age, years (Mean ± SD)
45.1 ± 13.2
Age categories, n (%)
18–25 years
6 (10.9%)
26–45 years
17 (30.9%)
46–65 years
30 (54.5%)
>65 years
2 (3.6%)
Sex, n (%)
Male
33 (60%)
Female
22 (40%)
Height, cm (Mean ± SD)
159.1 ± 10.9
Weight, kg (Mean ± SD)
51.5 ± 11.2
BMI, kg/m² (Mean ± SD)
20.5 ± 5.0
BMI categories, n (%)
≥25 (Overweight)
7 (12.7%)
18.5-24.9 (Normal)
31 (56.4%)
16-18.4 (Mild–Moderate Underweight)
8 (14.5%)
9 (16.4%)
History of TB treatment, n (%)
New case
41 (74.5%)
Relapse
8 (14.5%)
Lost to follow-up (LTFU)
6 (10.9%)
Comorbidities, n (%)
Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
29 (52.7%)
HIV
5 (9.1%)
Anti-TB treatment regimen duration, n (%)
Short-term regimen
34 (61.8%)
Long-term regimen
21 (38.2%)
Initial treatment regimens, n (%)
6 Bdq-Lfx-Lzd-Cfz-Cs-VitB6 / 14 Lfx-Cfz-Cs-VitB6
1 (1.8%)
6 Lfx-Lzd-Cfz-Cs-Amk-VitB6 / 14 Lfx-Lzd-Clz-Cs-VitB6
20 (36.4%)
6 Bdq-Lfx-Eto-E-Z-Hh-Cfz / 5 Lfx-Cfz-Z-E (Non-injectable STR)
6 (10.9%)
BPAL (Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid)
2 (3.6%)
BPALM (Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid-Moxifloxacin)
26 (47.3%)
Treatment outcomes, n (%)
Failure due to diagnosis change
5 (9.1%)
Lost to follow-up (LTFU)
6 (10.9%)
Death
9 (16.4%)
Still on treatment
18 (32.7%)
Cured
17 (30.9%)
CT Value IS6110–IS1081 (Mean ± SD)
18.8 ± 4
Baseline Sputum Smear (AFB), n (%)
0
24 (43.6%)
Scanty
3 (5.5%)
+1
14 (25.5%)
+2
5 (9.1%)
+3
9 (16.4%)
Modified Bandim TB Score (Mean ± SD)
5.5 ± 2.7
Modified Bandim TB Score category, n (%)
Mild
30 (54.5%)
Moderate–Severe
25 (45.5%)
Clinical manifestations, n (%)
Body temperature >37°C
37 (67.3%)
Cough
54 (98.2%)
Hemoptysis (coughing blood)
16 (29.1%)
Shortness of breath
37 (67.3%)
Night sweats
31 (56.4%)
Chest pain
19 (34.5%)
Heart rate >90 bpm
36 (65.5%)
Anemia (Hb
19 (34.5%)
Positive auscultation (rhonchi/crepitations)
29 (52.7%)
Radiological findings, n (%)
Atelectasis
2 (3.6%)
Pleural effusion
2 (3.6%)
Fibrosis
7 (12.7%)
Fibrothorax
2 (3.6%)
Cavities
19 (34.5%)
Consolidation
1 (1.8%)
Miliary
1 (1.8%)
Nodules
21 (38.2%)

BMI: Body Mass Index; TB: Tuberculosis; LTFU: Lost to Follow-Up; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; Bdq: Bedaquiline; Lfx: Levofloxacin; Lzd: Linezolid; Cfz: Clofazimine; Cs: Cycloserine; Am: Amikacin; Eto: Ethionamide; E: Ethambutol; Z: Pyrazinamide; Hh: High-Dose Isoniazid; STR: Streptomycin; SD: Standard Deviation; Hb: Hemoglobin; AFB: Acid-Fast Bacilli.

Statistical testing using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov method indicated that most data were not normally distributed; however, data homogeneity enabled the use of non-parametric tests for further analysis. Evaluation of the association between sputum smear scores and clinical characteristics revealed no significant correlations. Age, sex, BMI, TB treatment history, and the presence of comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and HIV, did not differ significantly across the smear score categories. Although chest pain appeared more frequently in the higher smear score group, the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.059). The Modified Bandim TB Score tended to increase with higher smear scores, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.171). Similarly, radiological features, such as cavities, fibrosis, nodules, and pleural effusion, were distributed across the smear score groups without significant variation. No clinical or demographic variables demonstrated a statistically significant association with sputum smear score, although some trends may have clinical implications (Table S1).

Analysis of IS6110–IS1081 CT values also demonstrated no significant association with most patient characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, treatment history, or treatment outcome. Common clinical symptoms, such as fever, cough, dyspnea, night sweats, anemia, and abnormal auscultation findings, were not significantly correlated with CT values. Radiological findings revealed no significant associations. However, two noteworthy findings emerged. First, a significant association was found between CT values and the Modified Bandim TB Score (p = 0.027): patients with mild disease exhibited higher mean CT values (20.2 ± 4.8), reflecting a lower bacterial burden, compared to those with moderate-to-severe scores (17.0 ± 1.8) (Table 2). This relationship was confirmed by multivariate linear regression (p = 0.002), yielding the following model: CT value = 23.535 – 3.271 × Bandim Score. Second, chest pain was significantly associated with lower CT values (p = 0.015), suggesting a higher bacterial load: multivariate analysis supported this finding (p = 0.003), with the regression equation: CT value = 19.936 – 3.357 × chest pain.

Table (2):
Association between IS6110-IS1081 CT Value and Characteristics of Patients with Rifampicin-Resistant Pulmonary TB

Variable
CT Value (Mean ± SD)
p-value
Age
0.143¹
18–25 years (n = 6)
19.9 ± 5.4
26–45 years (n = 17)
18.1 ± 3.5
46–65 years (n = 30)
19.1 ± 4.2
>65 years (n = 2)
16.1 ± 0.0
Sex
0.959²
Male (n = 33)
19.2 ± 4.4
Female (n = 22)
18.1 ± 3.4
BMI (kg/m²)
0.081¹
≥25 (n = 7)
19.4 ± 4.8
18.5–24.9 (n = 31)
19.5 ± 4.3
16–18.4 (n = 8)
17.9 ± 4.1
16.5 ± 1
Treatment History
0.820¹
New (n = 41)
18.9 ± 4
Relapse (n = 8)
18.7 ± 4.3
LTFU (n = 6)
18.2 ± 4.6
Treatment Outcome
0.821¹
Failure due to diagnosis change (n = 5)
21 ± 6.5
LTFU (n = 6)
17.3 ± 1.9
Death (n = 9)
17.6 ± 2.7
Under treatment (n = 18)
18.4 ± 3.7
Cured (n = 17)
19.7 ± 4.6
Modified Bandim TB Score (Mean ± SD)
18.8 ± 4
Modified Bandim TB Score
0.027²
Mild (n = 30)
20.2 ± 4.8
Moderate–Severe (n = 25)
17 ± 1.8
Clinical Manifestations
Temperature >37°C (n = 37)
18.3 ± 3.7
0.260²
Cough (n = 54)
18.6 ± 4
0.218²
Hemoptysis (n = 16)
18.2 ± 4.2
0.183²
Dyspnea (n = 37)
18.2 ± 3.4
0.564²
Night sweats (n = 31)
17.8 ± 3.1
0.078²
Chest pain (n = 19)
16.6 ± 0.8
0.015²
HR >90 bpm (n = 36)
18.1 ± 3.4
0.540²
Anemia (n = 19)
17.1 ± 1.4
0.429²
Positive auscultation (n = 29)
18.3 ± 3.7
0.379²
Radiologic Manifestations
Atelectasis (n = 2)
16.2 ± 0.1
0.264²
Pleural effusion (n = 2)
20.6 ± 6.1
0.512²
Fibrosis (n = 7)
19.1 ± 4.4
0.739²
Fibrothorax (n = 2)
16.2 ± 0.2
0.436²
Cavities (n = 19)
18.6 ± 4.2
0.908²
Consolidation (n = 1)
16 ± –
0.109²
Miliary pattern (n = 1)
16.6 ± –
0.945²
Nodules (n = 21)
19.3 ± 4.2
0.424²

Note: ¹ Kruskal-Wallis test (for variables with >2 categories)
² Mann-Whitney test (for binary variables)

A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between sputum smear scores and IS6110–IS1081 CT values (Table 3). The mean CT values declined progressively, from 20.5 in smear-negative patients to 16.4 in those with a smear score of +3. This modest, but significant, negative correlation (r = -0.342; p = 0.011) indicated that higher smear grades were associated with lower CT values, reflecting a greater bacterial burden. Multivariate linear regression confirmed this association (p = 0.036) using the equation: CT value = 2.851-0.091 × sputum smear score. Although the coefficient of determination was low (R² = 0.080), the results suggest that the smear score may independently predict bacterial load.

Table (3):
Association Between Sputum Smear Score and IS6110-IS1081 CT Value in Patients with Rifampicin-Resistant Pulmonary TB

Variable
IS6110-IS1081 CT Value (Mean ± SD)
r (Spearman Correlation)
p-value
Sputum Smear Score
0
20.5 ± 4.7
Scanty
20.3 ± 3.2
+1
17.8 ± 3.8
+2
16.7 ± 0.8
+3
16.4 ± 0.7
Total (All Groups)
18.8 ± 4
r = -0.342
0.011

Finally, analysis of factors associated with treatment failure revealed significant associations with treatment regimen (p = 0.039), anemia (p = 0.005), and specific radiological findings, particularly cavitation (p = 0.028) and fibrothorax (p = 0.024). Patients who underwent long-course regimens experienced higher treatment failure rates than those who underwent short-course regimens. Anemia was markedly more prevalent among patients who experienced treatment failure (Table 4). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified anemia (odds ratio [OR] 13.211; p = 0.023) and a long-course regimen (OR 7.302; p = 0.026) as independent predictors of treatment failure. Although cavity formation exhibited a trend toward increased risk (OR 4.254), it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.113), and fibrothorax was excluded from the model due to undefined odds (Table 5).

Table (4):
Factors Associated with Treatment Failure

Variable
Treatment Failure N=38
Treatment Success N = 17
p-value
Age, years, n (%)
0.681¹
18–25 years (n = 6)
5 (13.2%)
1 (5.8%)
26–45 years (n = 17)
12 (31.6%)
5 (29.4%)
46–65 years (n = 30)
19 (50%)
11 (64.7%)
>65 years (n = 2)
2 (5.2%)
0 (0%)
Sex, n (%)
0.808²
Male (n = 33)
22 (57.9%)
11 (64.7%)
Female (n = 22)
16 (42.1%)
6 (35.3%)
BMI (kg/m²), n (%)
0.269¹
≥25 (n = 7)
6 (15.8%)
1 (5.9%)
18.5–24.9 (n = 31)
21 (55.3%)
10 (58.8%)
16–18.4 (n = 8)
4 (10.5%)
4 (23.5%)
7 (18.4%)
2 (11.7%)
Treatment History, n (%)
0.809¹
New (n = 41)
28 (73.6%)
13 (76.5%)
Relapse (n = 8)
6 (15.8%)
2 (11.7%)
LTFU (n = 6)
4 (10.5%)
2 (11.7%)
Comorbidities, n (%)
Diabetes Mellitus (n = 29)
21 (55.3%)
8 (47%)
0.795²
HIV (n = 5)
3 (7.9%)
2 (11.8%)
0.573²
Anti-TB Treatment Regimen Duration, n (%)
0.039²
Short-term (n = 34)
20 (52.6%)
14 (82.3%)
Long-term (n = 21)
18 (47.4%)
3 (17.6%)
CT Value IS6110–IS1081
(Mean ± SD)
18.3 ± 3.7
19.9 ± 4.6
0.372³
Baseline Sputum Smear, n (%)
0.758¹
0
18 (47.4%)
6 (35.3%)
Scanty
2 (5.3
+1
7 (18.4%)
7 (37.5%)
+2
4 (10.5%)
1 (5.9%)
+3
7 (18.4%)
2 (11.8%)
Modified Bandim TB Score
(Mean ± SD)
5.7 ± 2.7
4.8 ± 2.7
Modified Bandim TB Score
 
 
0.175²
Mild (n = 30)
18 (47.4%)
12 (70.6%)
Moderate–Severe (n = 25)
20 (52.6%)
5 (29.4%)
Clinical Manifestations
 
 
 
Temperature >37°C (n = 37)
29 (76.3%)
8 (47%)
0.080²
Cough (n = 54)
38 (100%)
16 (94.1%)
0.115²
Hemoptysis (n = 16)
12 (30.8%)
4 (23.5%)
0.669²
Dyspnea (n = 37)
26 (66.7%)
11 (64.7%)
0.881²
Night sweats (n = 31)
23 (59%)
8 (47%)
0.542²
Chest pain (n = 19)
14 (35.9%)
5 (29.4%)
0.742²
HR >90 bpm (n = 36)
26 (66.7%)
10 (58.8%)
0.768²
Anemia (n = 19)
18 (46.2%)
1 (5.9%)
0.005²
Positive auscultation (n = 29)
19 (48.7%)
10 (58.8%)
0.352²
Radiologic Manifestations
 
 
 
Atelectasis (n = 2)
1 (2.6%)
1 (5.9%)
0.507²
Pleural effusion (n = 2)
1 (2.6%)
1 (5.9%)
0.507²
Fibrosis (n = 7)
3 (7.7%)
4 (23.5%)
0.080²
Fibrothorax (n = 2)
0 (0%)
2 (11.8%)
0.024²
Cavities (n = 19)
17 (43.6%)
2 (11.8%)
0.028²
Consolidation (n = 1)
1 (2.6%)
0 (0%)
0.518²
Miliary pattern (n = 1)
1 (2.6%)
0 (0%)
0.518²
Nodules (n = 21)
15 (38.5%)
6 (35.3%)
0.947²

Notes: ¹ Kruskal-Wallis Test for variables with ≥3 categories; ² Chi-square Test for variables with 2 categories; ³ Mann-Whitney Test for continuous variables; * p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance

Table (5):
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Associated with Treatment Failure

Factor
p-value
OR
95% CI
Long-course treatment regimen
0.026*
7.302
(1.265-42.144)
Anemia
0.023*
13.211
(1.431-121.925)
Fibrothorax
0.999
0.000
(0.000 – –)
Cavity
0.113
4.254
(0.709-25.523)

*p< 0.05 indicates statistical significance

DISCUSSION

Indonesia, one of the countries with the highest TB burden in Southeast Asia, faces substantial challenges in terms of TB control and management. Along with Bangladesh and the Philippines, Indonesia accounted for 18% of global TB incidence in 2017, recording an estimated 969,000 new or relapsed TB cases in 2021.16,17 Indonesia faces a substantial detection and notification gap—55% of estimated TB cases in 2021 were undiagnosed or unreported, higher than India (33%) and Bangladesh (18%) but lower than Myanmar (67%).17 Only 30% of infectious TB cases were detected, similar to the Philippines (22%) and far below Bangladesh’s near-total detection.16 Drug-resistant TB poses a major obstacle: the Southeast Asia (SEA) region accounted for 38% of the global multidrug-resistant (MDR)/RR-TB burden in 2021, and Indonesia is classified among the high-burden countries for MDR/RR-TB, struggling with one of the highest notification gaps regionally (70%).17 The Philippines, classified within the SEA/WPR region, was estimated to have 9000 MDR-TB cases in 2019, while Vietnam had 6000. Moreover, research has projected that the proportion of MDR-TB cases in the Philippines will increase to 8.9% by 2040.18 In terms of workplace TB policies, the Philippines leads the region with the most comprehensive coverage (13 of 17 WHO/International Labour Organization-recommended components), ahead of Myanmar, Malaysia, and Cambodia.19 Overall, Indonesia shares key challenges with the Philippines—high infectious TB prevalence and wide notification gaps—while also contending with one of the highest MDR-TB burdens in the region.17

The present study provides a comprehensive overview of the demographic, clinical, radiological, and molecular characteristics of patients with RR-TB treated at the Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya. Most patients were male and within the productive age range (20-50 years), aligning with global epidemiological trends that associate this group with a higher TB risk due to increased social mobility, occupational exposure, and broader interaction networks.20-22 The observed male predominance is consistent with previous findings and may be attributed to behavioral factors, such as smoking and treatment adherence,20,23 although disparities in access to healthcare may place women at increased risk in specific settings.24

While most patients had a normal BMI, cases of malnutrition (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) and anemia were notable. Both conditions are established risk factors for TB, and are associated with impaired immunity and poor outcomes. Anemia alone may increase TB susceptibility up to four-fold.25 Nutritional interventions—including individualized dietary plans, micronutrient supplementation, and ongoing counseling—have demonstrated efficacy in improving treatment outcomes.

Interestingly, the majority of cases were newly diagnosed, even though previous TB treatment history remains a strong predictor of RR-TB, with an estimated five-fold increased risk.23 This trend suggests that the transmission of resistant MTB strains is increasingly driven by community spread rather than acquired resistance, potentially facilitated by compensatory mutations that enhance bacterial fitness.26-28 These findings emphasize the need for early drug-resistance screening, even in treatment-naןve patients.

Diabetes mellitus emerged as the most common comorbidity, consistent with its known role in increasing both TB-specific and all-cause mortality (OR 1.90 and 4.54, respectively), largely due to impaired immune responses and reduced therapeutic efficacy.29 Although HIV co-infection was rare in this cohort, it remains clinically significant given its association with a more than 28-fold increase in TB mortality and substantial treatment complexity.

Most patients were managed using the WHO-recommended, short-course BPaLM regimen (bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin), which has demonstrated high effectiveness and favorable adherence profiles in other high-burden settings.30,31 The average treatment duration was 26 weeks, which was extended to 39 weeks based on clinical or radiological response(s). Adverse effects, primarily anemia, neuropathy, and gastrointestinal symptoms, were generally mild to moderate and managed without treatment discontinuation, underscoring the importance of structured pharmacovigilance to ensure adherence.

Laboratory data revealed that many smear-negative patients had low IS6110–IS1081 CT values, indicating a substantial bacillary load detectable only via molecular methods. This highlights the limitations of smear microscopy—particularly in RR-TB—and supports the superior sensitivity of digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) as demonstrated by Li et al.14 Clinical symptoms, such as cough, fever, and dyspnea, are common, whereas radiological findings are dominated by cavitary and nodular lesions, fibrosis, and pleural effusion, which are the hallmarks of advanced pulmonary damage.

Although no significant associations were observed between sputum smear scores and clinical, demographic, or radiological features, a modest but consistent inverse correlation was found between smear scores and CT values (r = -0.342; p = 0.011). This finding supports the biological plausibility that a higher bacillary load corresponds to lower CT values because lower CTs indicate higher concentrations of MTB DNA. Smear-negative and scanty cases demonstrated the highest mean CT values (20.5 ± 4.7 and 20.3 ± 3.2), whereas patients with +2 and +3 smear scores exhibited notably lower mean CT values (16.7 ± 0.8 and 16.4 ± 0.7). This trend aligns with the quantitative principle of PCR, in which amplification occurs more rapidly in samples with higher DNA content.32 Similarly, Gota, Shenoy, and Kamath14 reported a stronger polychoric correlation (σ = -0.8681) between smear grade and CT, reinforcing the robustness of this inverse relationship. Although Li et al.33 did not directly analyze smear correlation, their work supports the high sensitivity of dPCR for detecting MTB DNA, even in smear-negative specimens.33

CT values were further associated with clinical severity: lower values were significantly associated with higher Modified Bandim TB scores and the presence of chest pain. Multivariate analysis confirmed that both variables were independently correlated with CT values (p = 0.036; β = -0.091) despite the limited explanatory power of the model (R² = 0.080). This suggests that smear scores and CT values, while related, are influenced by distinct factors, such as bacterial viability, DNA degradation, and host immune status. CT overlaps across smear categories and instances of low CT values in culture-negative samples,14 further indicating that PCR may detect nonviable DNA, thereby limiting its utility in assessing infectivity.

Importantly, treatment failure was independently associated with prolonged therapy and the presence of anemia, both of which exhibited statistically significant ORs. These results underscore the multifactorial nature of RR-TB treatment outcomes and the need for integrated clinical decision making that considers biological, treatment-related, and host-specific variables.

CONCLUSION

Results of the present study reinforce that, while smear microscopy retains value for assessing infectivity, it is limited in sensitivity and is poorly correlated with clinical and radiological severity. In contrast, molecular diagnostics, particularly CT values from PCR assays, offer a more precise and quantitative estimation of bacillary burden and may better reflect clinical severity. However, CT values alone are insufficient for predicting treatment outcomes due to technical and biological variability. Thus, an integrated approach that combines molecular diagnostics with clinical scoring systems, radiological assessments, and patient profiling is essential for effective management of RR-TB. Future longitudinal studies incorporating immunological and socioeconomic factors are warranted to better understand the complex interplay that influences the disease trajectory and treatment success in RR-TB.

The present study had several limitations, the first of which was its relatively small sample size, thus limiting statistical power and generalizability of the findings. Second, culture-based confirmation of rifampicin resistance was not performed because molecular diagnostics (GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra) were used as the primary reference. Third, the single-center design may not fully represent the broader RR-TB population in Indonesia. Despite these limitations, this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between bacterial burden, clinical severity, and treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with RR-TB.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Additional file: Table S1.

Declarations

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the clinical, laboratory, and radiology staff of Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, for their invaluable assistance during data collection. The authors are also thankful to the Department of Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology, Pulmonology, and the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, for their academic support and institutional collaboration.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
DC and NMM conceptualized the study. DC, NMM and PBP designed the study. DC and NMM performed data curation, data extraction and laboratory record management. NMM supervision of laboratory procedures, guidance on microbiological analysis. AP supervision of clinical aspects, radiological data analysis, interpretation of clinical correlations. PDE supervision of microbiological methodology, clinical correlation interpretation, patient chart review. AT provided guidance on statistical methodology, validation of analysis, and critical input on data interpretation. DC wrote the manuscript. DC, NMM, AP, PBP, PDE reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript for publication.

FUNDING
None.

DATA AVAILABILITY
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

ETHICS STATEMENT
This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia (Ethical Clearance No. 1980/LOE/301.4.2/V/2025).

INFORMED CONSENT
Written informed consent was obtained from the participants before enrolling in the study.

References
  1. Bhunia SK, Sarkar M, Banerjee A, Giri B. An update on pathogenesis and management of tuberculosis with special reference to drug resistance. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2015;5(9):673-686.
    Crossref
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Tuberculosis Report 2024. https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2024
  3. Caraux-Paz P, Diamantis S, de Wazieres B, Gallien S. Tuberculosis in the Elderly. J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5888.
    Crossref
  4. Caceres G, Calderon R, Ugarte-Gil C. Tuberculosis and comorbidities: treatment challenges in patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus and depression. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2022;9:20499361221095831.
    Crossref
  5. Martinez L, Warren JL, Harries AD, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of tuberculosis incidence and case detection among incarcerated individuals from 2000 to 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet Public Heal. 2023;8(7):e511-e519.
    Crossref
  6. Mvelase NR, Cele LP, Singh R, et al. Consequences of rpoB mutations missed by the GenoType MTBDRplus assay in a programmatic setting in South Africa. Afr J Lab Med. 2023;12(1):1-8.
    Crossref
  7. Bada FO, Blok N, Okpokoro E, et al. Cost comparison of nine-month treatment regimens with 20-month standardized care for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant/multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in Nigeria. Furin J, ed. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0241065.
    Crossref
  8. Yalley AK, Ahiatrogah S, Kafintu-Kwashie AA, et al. A Systematic Review on Suitability of Molecular Techniques for Diagnosis and Research into Infectious Diseases of Concern in Resource-Limited Settings. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;44(10):4367-4385.
    Crossref
  9. Gelaw B, Shiferaw Y, Alemayehu M, Bashaw AA. Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay and smear microscopy with culture for the diagnostic accuracy of tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):79.
    Crossref
  10. Manalebh A, Demissie M, Mekonnen D, Abera B. The Quality of Sputum Smear Microscopy in Public-Private Mix Directly Observed Treatment Laboratories in West Amhara Region, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0123749.
    Crossref
  11. Sorvor FKB, Ewusie EA. The Impact of Genexpert MTB/RIF Technology on the Minimization of Tuberculosis: A Review of Literature. Asian J Med Heal. 2024;22(1):1-12.
    Crossref
  12. Chowdhury K, Ahmad R, Sinha S, Dutta S, Haque M. Multidrug-Resistant TB (MDR-TB) and Extensively Drug-Resistant TB (XDR-TB) Among Children: Where We Stand Now. Cureus. 2023;15(2):1-15.
    Crossref
  13. Tamara D, Esfandiari F, Triwahyuni T. Hubungan Nilai Cycle Threshold Value (Ct Value) Dengan Tingkat Kematian Pasien Covid 19 Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (Rsud) Pesawaran Lampung. J Univ Malahayati. 2021;1(1):1-10.
  14. Gota BVA, Shenoy VP, Kamath A. Correlation of Cyclic Threshold Values Generated by GeneXpert Ultra MTB/RIF and Fluorescence Microscopy to Predict Mycobacterial Burden in Suspected Cases of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2024;13(1):47-52.
    Crossref
  15. Cooper R, Williams M, Fennelly KP. Abandon the Acid-Fast Bacilli Smear for Patients With TB on Effective Treatment. Chest. 2023;164(1):21-23.
    Crossref
  16. Kak N, Chakraborty K, Sadaphal S, Almossawi HJ, Calnan M, Begum V. Strategic priorities for TB control in Bangladesh, Indonesia, and the Philippines – comparative analysis of national TB prevalence surveys. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(560):1-7.
    Crossref
  17. Bhatia V, Rijal S, Sharma M, et al. Ending TB in South-East Asia/ : fl agship priority and response transformation. Lancet Reg Heal – Southeast Asia. 2023;18:100301.
    Crossref
  18. Song HW, Tian JH, Song HP, Guo SJ, Lin YH, Pan JS. Tracking multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a-year analysis of global, regional, and national trends. Front Public Heal. 2024;12(1):1408316.
    Crossref
  19. Roxas EA, Fadrilan-camacho VFF, Hernandez PMR, et al. A Review of Workplace Tuberculosis Policies in Selected Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Asia-Pacific. Acta Medica Phillipina. 2025;59(4):65-77.
    Crossref
  20. Maulina N, Hayati Z, Hasballah K, Zulkarnain Z, Waraztuty I, Defadheandra A. Rifampicin Resistant Tuberculosis Among Presumptive Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Province Referral Hospital, Indonesia: Dynamic Cases of a 7-Year Report. Hamadan Univ Med Sci. 2024;24(1):e00601-e00601.
    Crossref
  21. Madaki S, Mohammed Y, Rogo LD, Yusuf M, Bala YG. Age and gender in drug resistance tuberculosis: A cross-sectional case study at a national tuberculosis reference hospital in Nigeria. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2024;39:175-183.
    Crossref
  22. Nakigozi H, Mukama P, Tumwine G, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Rifampicin Resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis among Human Immune Virus Sero-Positive Patients in South Western Uganda. 2023:1-16.
    Crossref
  23. Kida IM, Garbati MA, Ummate I, et al. Rifampicin Resistant Tuberculosis/ : Prevalence and Risk Factors among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients in Maiduguri, Northeastern Nigeria. Borno Med J. 2017;14(2):190-196.
  24. Lolong DB, Kristna, Pangaribuan L, et al. Rifampicin Resistance in Tuberculosis Patients: Cause-Related Factors in Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Heal. 2017;53(4):743-756.
  25. Sagala ABM, Rekawati E, Nursasi AY. The Effect of Nutritional Management in the Nutritional Status of Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Systematic Review Literature. Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research. 2024;6(3):1161-1172.
    Crossref
  26. Brandis G, Wrande M, Liljas L, Hughes D. Fitness compensatory mutations in rifampicin resistant RNA polymerase. Mol Microbiol. 2012;85(1):142-151.
    Crossref
  27. Su W, Ruan YZ, Li T, Du X, Jiang JW, Li RZ. Characteristics of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis detection in China, 2015-2019. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):99.
    Crossref
  28. Xia X. Horizontal Gene Transfer and Drug Resistance Involving Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antibiotics. 2023;12(9).
    Crossref
  29. Nowinski A, Wesolowski S, Korzeniewska-Kosela M. The impact of comorbidities on tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Poland: a national cohort study. Front Public Heal. 2023;11:1-12.
    Crossref
  30. James LP, Klaassen F, Sweeney S, et al. Impact and cost-effectiveness of the 6-month BPaLM regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Moldova: A mathematical modeling analysis. PLOS Med. 2024;21(5):e1004401.
    Crossref
  31. Khan MA, Ismail A, Ghafoor A, et al. Experience of piloting BPaLM/BPaL for DR-TB care at selected sites in Pakistan. IJTLD OPEN. 2024;1(11):508-515.
    Crossref
  32. Chilambi GS, Reiss R, Daivaa N, et al. Optimal processing of tongue swab samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection by the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay. Microbiology Spectrum. 2025;13(3):e0240324.
    Crossref
  33. Zhuang L, Yang L, Li L, Ye Z, Gong W. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: immune response, biomarkers, and therapeutic intervention. MedComm. 2024;5(1):1-33.
    Crossref

Article Metrics

Article View: 222

Share This Article

© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.