<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<!--<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="article.xsl"?>-->
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en"
    xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id journal-id-type="issn">0973-7510</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
            <issn pub-type="epub">2581-690X</issn>
            <publisher>
                <publisher-name>DR. M.N. Khan</publisher-name>
            </publisher>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22207/JPAM.20.3.36</article-id>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Comparative Assessment of Anti-biofilm Capacity of Common Sanitizers against Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Diverse Origins</article-title>
            </title-group>
 
			<contrib-group>


				<contrib contrib-type="author">
                <name>
                    <surname>Karim</surname>
                    <given-names>Abdelkadir</given-names>
                </name>
                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
            </contrib>

			<contrib contrib-type="author">
                <name>
                    <surname>Didouh</surname>
                    <given-names>Nassima</given-names>
                </name>
                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/>
                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/>
            </contrib>

			<contrib contrib-type="author">
                <name>
                    <surname>Achek</surname>
                    <given-names>Rachid</given-names>
                </name>
                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/>
            </contrib>

			<contrib contrib-type="author">
                <name>
                    <surname>Nabi</surname>
                    <given-names>Ibrahim</given-names>
                </name>
                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-5"/>
            </contrib>

			<contrib contrib-type="author">
                <name>
                    <surname>Araujo</surname>
                    <given-names>Ricardo</given-names>
                </name>
                <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-6"/>
            </contrib>
				
			</contrib-group>


      <aff id="aff-1">Faculty of Nature and Life and Earth Sciences, Djilali-Bounaama University, 44001, Khemis-Miliana, Algeria.</aff>
      <aff id="aff-2">Faculty of Nature and Life, Abou Bekr Belkaid University, Tlemcen, Algeria.</aff>
      <aff id="aff-3">Laboratoire de Microbiologie Applique a l’Agroalimentaire au Biomedical et a l’Environnement, 13000, Tlemcen, Algeria.</aff>
      <aff id="aff-4">Laboratory of Food Hygiene and Quality Assurance System, High National Veterinary School, Algiers 16059, Algeria.</aff>
      <aff id="aff-5">Laboratory of Biotechnology and Valorisation of Biological Resources BVRB, Faculty of Sciences, Yahia Fares University, Medea, 26000, Algeria.</aff>
      <aff id="aff-6">INEB – Instituto de Engenharia Biomedica, i3S – Instituto de Investigacao e Inovacaoem Saude, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.</aff>


            <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-09-01">
                <day>01</day>
				<month>09</month>
                <year>2026</year>
            </pub-date>
            <volume>20</volume>
            <issue>3</issue>
            <fpage>2429</fpage>
            <lpage>2446</lpage>
            <permissions>
                <copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2026 The Author(s)</copyright-statement>
                <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
                <license license-type="open-access"
                    xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
                    <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.<uri
					xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
                            >https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</uri></license-p>
                </license>
            </permissions>
            <self-uri xlink:href="https://microbiologyjournal.org/comparative-assessment-of-anti-biofilm-capacity-of-common-sanitizers-against-staphylococcus-aureus-isolated-from-diverse-origins/"/>
            <abstract>
                <p>Staphylococcus aureus colonizes the skin and nasal orifices of both humans and animals. Biofilm-related infections and acquired antimicrobial resistance render this bacterium a major health concern. This study examined the biofilm-forming capacity of eight S. aureus isolates originating from humans, sheep, and food matrices in northern Algeria. The efficiency of sanitizers (povidone–iodine [PVI], peracetic acid [PAA], quaternary ammonium compounds [QACs] and chlorhexidine [CHX]) in inhibiting and detaching biofilms was also assessed. Biofilm-production ability was assessed using a tissue culture plate. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration were measured for each sanitizer, and antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined by performing the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion assay. All S. aureus isolates demonstrated the ability to produce biofilms, and among these, food and sheep mastitis isolates exhibited a strong capacity for biofilm formation. CHX exhibited the highest efficacy in bacterial biofilm inhibition and was considered more potent than the other sanitizers (P &lt; 0.0001). Further, it exhibited lower MIC interval values (0.98-1.9 µg/g). However, MIC interval values for PVI, PAA, and QACs were 3125-25000, 39.06-156.25, and 0.98-3.9 mg/L, respectively. PVI did not affect biofilm detachment at different concentrations. All isolates were sensitive to methicillin (with mecA/mecC genes not detected), gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim, vancomycin, and amikacin; however, two isolates were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin. These findings demonstrated the biofilm-forming potential of S. aureus isolates and confirmed the effectiveness of sanitizers against S. aureus isolated from different sources.</p></abstract>
		<kwd-group>
        <title>Keywords</title>
        <kwd>Staphylococcus aureus</kwd>
        <kwd>Biofilm</kwd>
        <kwd>Sanitizers</kwd>
        <kwd>Antimicrobial Resistance</kwd>
        <kwd>Chlorhexidine</kwd>
        <kwd>Peracetic Acid</kwd>
        <kwd>Quaternary Ammonium</kwd>
		</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>